brooklyn-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Richard Downer <rich...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Release Apache Brooklyn 0.11.0 [rc3]
Date Tue, 16 May 2017 19:37:42 GMT
Urgh, we'd better investigate. If there's a failure in one of our "try this
to get started!" blueprints I'd consider that a release blocker. Hopefully
there's a good reason, or at least a simple workaround...

Richard.

On 16 May 2017 at 17:28, Geoff Macartney <geoff.macartney@cloudsoftcorp.com>
wrote:

> I get this too Richard:
>
> start failed with error:
> org.apache.brooklyn.util.core.task.DynamicSequentialTask$
> QueueAbortedException:
> Cannot add a task to Task[start]@iEOrS6Mt whose queue has been aborted
> (trying to add Task[Cross-context execution: Invoking effector joinCluster
> on RiakNode:d5gt with parameters {nodeName=
> riak@ec2-54-154-176-140.eu-west-1.compute.amazonaws.com}]@U09W94lm)
>
> Failure running task Cross-context execution: Invoking effector joinCluster
> on RiakNode:vrua with parameters {nodeName=
> riak@ec2-54-154-176-140.eu-west-1.compute.amazonaws.com} (lpAS8V4t): Error
> invoking joinCluster at RiakNodeImpl{id=vrua9dk6kf}: Execution failed,
> invalid result 1 for joinCluster RiakNodeImpl{id=vrua9dk6kf}
>
>
>
> On Tue, 16 May 2017 at 17:03 Richard Downer <richard@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I'm trying out the rc3 and seeing a problem. If I deploy the "Template 3"
> > app (web server + Riak cluster) from the "New Application" window, then
> the
> > individual cluster nodes appear to start, but the cluster as a whole goes
> > on fire.
> >
> > Drilling down, it appears to be a "join cluster" activity which is
> failing.
> > The stdout of the task says:
> > "Node riak@ec2-52-57-99-169.eu-central-1.compute.amazonaws.com is not
> > reachable!"
> >
> > This is running in AWS EC2 in eu-central-1 - everything is in the same
> > region.
> >
> > Can anybody else reproduce?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Richard.
> >
> >
> > On 12 May 2017 at 17:09, Richard Downer <richard@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > This thread is for discussions related to the release vote.
> > >
> > > I should clarify what we are looking for in a release vote.
> Particularly,
> > > we are looking for people to download,validate, and test the release.
> > > Only if you are satisfied that the artifacts are correct and the
> quality
> > is
> > > high enough, should you make a "+1" vote. Alongside your vote you
> should
> > > list
> > > the checks that you made.
> > >
> > > Here is a good example: http://markmail.org/message/gevsz2pdciraw6jw
> > >
> > > The vote is not simply about "the master branch contains the features I
> > > wanted" -
> > > it is about making sure that *these* artifacts are *correct* (e.g. they
> > are
> > > not corrupted, hashes and signatures pass) and are of *sufficiently
> high
> > > quality* to be stamped as an official release of The Apache Software
> > > Foundation.
> > >
> > > Why test the artifacts when master is looking good? Here are some
> > reasons:
> > >
> > > - somebody could have made a commit that broke it, since you last git
> > > pulled
> > > - the release branch could have been made at the wrong point, or
> > > inconsistently
> > >   between all of the submodules
> > > - something in the release process could have broken it
> > > - I could have made a mistake and corrupted the files
> > > - a problem with the Apache infrastructure could mean that the release
> > > files are
> > >   unobtainable or corrupted
> > >
> > > This is why the release manager needs you to download the actual
> release
> > > artifacts and try them out.
> > >
> > > The way Apache works can be a bit arcane sometimes, but it's all done
> > with
> > > a reason. If the vote passes then the contents of the email and its
> links
> > > become "endorsed" by The Apache Software Foundation, and the Foundation
> > > will
> > > take on legal liability for them, forever.
> > >
> > > And of course we want the best possible experience for our users - so
> we
> > > need
> > > the actual release files to be tested manually to make sure that a
> > mistake
> > > does
> > > not ruin the experience for users.
> > >
> > > So if you can spare an hour or more to download some of the artifacts
> and
> > > try
> > > them out, then it will be *very* useful! The vote lasts for three days
> so
> > > there's no need to rush to get a vote in.
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > > Richard Downer
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message