Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AA26200C2A for ; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 12:06:07 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 19472160B70; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 11:06:07 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 7FB47160B5E for ; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 12:06:06 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 13928 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2017 11:06:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@brooklyn.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@brooklyn.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@brooklyn.apache.org Received: (qmail 13914 invoked by uid 99); 1 Mar 2017 11:06:05 -0000 Received: from git1-us-west.apache.org (HELO git1-us-west.apache.org) (140.211.11.23) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 11:06:05 +0000 Received: by git1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at git1-us-west.apache.org, from userid 33) id 4732BDFDE6; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 11:06:05 +0000 (UTC) From: aledsage To: dev@brooklyn.apache.org Reply-To: dev@brooklyn.apache.org References: In-Reply-To: Subject: [GitHub] brooklyn-server issue #155: [WIP] Add DSL support for calling effectors in Y... Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <20170301110605.4732BDFDE6@git1-us-west.apache.org> Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 11:06:05 +0000 (UTC) archived-at: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 11:06:07 -0000 Github user aledsage commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-server/pull/155 On balance, I agree with @ahgittin that we should revert this, and first merge https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-server/pull/480 The changes in this PR were suggested on the mailing list as part of @grkvlt's message "[PROPOSAL] Enabling Effective Effectors" on 30/05/2016, but it wasn't properly discussed there. After reverting this, we need to kick off that discussion on the mailing list again. We need to more clearly describe the use-case that motivated this change. We can then discuss the philosophy behind it. For clarification, I believe the intent for the CA-server use-case was that the effector call happens *only once*; subsequent queries for the config key gets the value from that initial invocation (or blocks until the effector returns, if another thread is still executing it). But let's discuss that more on the mailing list. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---