brooklyn-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Aled Sage <>
Subject [PROPOSAL] Remove groovy dependency/support
Date Mon, 06 Mar 2017 19:01:41 GMT
Hi all,

I propose we deprecate and then remove the remaining groovy code from 
Brooklyn: deprecate for 0.11.0, and delete a couple of releases later.

I think we should treat Groovy like any other JVM-based language that 
users might want to use: it's the user's responsibility; we present a 
pure Java API that those languages can call.

I'd estimate the first stage (deprecation in 0.11.0) as being just a few 
hours work.

_*Advantages of Deleting this Code*_

  * Simplify our code base
    (with all the usual advantages of understandability, simpler
    refactoring, etc).
  * Make support easier
    (luckily no-one has asked any Groovy questions in years! Do we
    really want to fix any bugs that Groovy users hit?!)
  * Make it easier for (Java) developers:
      o More understandable e.g. the black magic of how "MethodEffector"
      o Easier IDE setup (e.g. don't need to worry about .groovy files,
        or risk breaking them if you ignore them)
  * Simplify our build process
  * Reduce our binary distribution by over 7MB

The most early versions of Brooklyn (before it joined Apache) were 
written in Groovy. We grew to regret that technology choice, and 
switched to pure Java instead. We also now strongly recommend users to 
focus on YAML-based blueprints whereever possible, which makes things 
like Groovy support even more redundant.

_*Current Usage*_
Groovy is (unfortunately) still used under-the-covers in a few places:

 1. Groovy's `ObservableList` is used under-the-covers by
 2. For a "MethodEffector", the effector invocation goes through
    `GroovyJavaMethods.invokeMethodOnMetaClass`. This calls into groovy
    code to find the method that matches the given arguments.
 3. `GroovyJavaMethods` is used for some groovy'isms (Groovy Truth

Groovy's closures have special support in various places - e.g. some 
methods are overloaded to accept a Closure instead of a 
Runnable/Callable/Function/Predicate. Also, the `TypeCoercions` means 
that one can often supply a Groovy closure instance (e.g. as a config 
key value) and have it automatically converted to Predicate/Function/etc.

I think our build does special groovy stuff (e.g. there are groovy test 
classes, which explicitly test the Closure support).

_*Next Steps*_
Assuming we agree...

For 0.11.0:

  * Deprecate all methods that take a Groovy parameter type (e.g.
    Closure, groovy.time.TimeDuration, etc).
  * Deprecate `GroovyJavaMethods` and the other classes in the
    `brooklyn-utils-groovy` module.
  * Include in the release notes that this is deprecated, and Groovy
    will be removed from Brooklyn in a future release.


  * Remove internal uses of Groovy, at our leisure.

In some future release:

  * Delete all the deprecated methods and utilities, the groovy
    dependency, the .groovy test classes, and any other mentions of it
    from our poms/build.

I'd estimate the first stage (for 0.11.0) as being just a few hours work.


  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message