brooklyn-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrea Turli <andrea.tu...@cloudsoftcorp.com>
Subject Re: Call for release: Brooklyn 0.10.0
Date Wed, 16 Nov 2016 14:26:12 GMT
+1

Svet,

FYI I'm working on #409 and #415 now that jclouds 2.0 is official released.

Andrea

On 16 November 2016 at 12:33, Svetoslav Neykov <
svetoslav.neykov@cloudsoftcorp.com> wrote:

> Is including jclouds 2.0 too big of a change to consider, what do people
> think?
> If that's considered too risky then I suggest following with a 0.11.0 not
> too long after, including jclouds 2.0.
> There's already work to get it running with Brooklyn at
> https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-server/pull/415 <
> https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-server/pull/415> and
> https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-server/pull/409 <
> https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-server/pull/409>.
>
> Svet.
>
>
> > On 16.11.2016 г., at 13:22, Aled Sage <aled.sage@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > It's far past time that we did a Brooklyn 0.10.0 release! I suggest we
> aim for that soon.
> >
> > To that end, I suggest the following steps:
> >
> > * Deal with open PRs:
> >     o People shout out about any PRs you think are very important to
> >       be merged, before that release.
> >     o Review open PRs
> >       (for any that won't get merged into 0.10.0, clearly mark them as
> >       such and say why).
> > * Any pending/remaining work:
> >     o Give people until Friday evening (uk time) to submit any other
> >       very important PRs that are being working on.
> >     o People shout out about any known issues that they see as
> >       blockers for a release.
> > * Do some initial testing, using master (before Friday).
> > * Aim to produce a first release candidate on Friday evening (uk time).
> > * Do the usual QA/fix cycle until the release is ready.
> > * Write release notes, etc.
> >
> > Of the first steps, reviewing the PRs is a big piece of work! If you
> have time to help, then please lend a hand by reviewing and/or testing the
> PRs, and commenting on them.
> >
> > I don't think we should try to squeeze lots of additional PRs into
> 0.10.0 - there is already a huge amount in there compared to 0.9.0!
> >
> > Richard, are our release process docs up-to-date at [1]?
> >
> > Aled
> >
> > [1] http://brooklyn.apache.org/developers/committers/release-
> process/index.html
> >
> >
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message