brooklyn-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Svetoslav Neykov <svetoslav.ney...@cloudsoftcorp.com>
Subject Re: Call for release: Brooklyn 0.10.0
Date Thu, 17 Nov 2016 17:15:29 GMT
Good point about the homebrew package John. Thanks.

Svet.


> On 17.11.2016 г., at 17:53, John McCabe <john@johnmccabe.net> wrote:
> 
> If there's a cli bump feel free to ping me about the homebrew release
> process if necessary (it's pretty straight forward).
> /John
> 
> On Thu, 17 Nov 2016, 15:19 Svetoslav Neykov, <
> svetoslav.neykov@cloudsoftcorp.com> wrote:
> 
>> Nobody else stepped up so I guess that's me. I'll give it a go.
>> 
>> Thanks.
>> Svet.
>> 
>> 
>>> On 17.11.2016 г., at 15:40, Richard Downer <richard@apache.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> The release-manager-to-be could also start running the release script[1]
>> a
>>> few times in dry run mode to catch any early issues.
>>> 
>>> [1]
>>> 
>> https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-dist/blob/master/release/make-release-artifacts.sh
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 17 November 2016 at 13:09, Aled Sage <aled.sage@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> +1, sounds great - thanks Andrea!
>>>> 
>>>> There are some really import jclouds fixes in 1.9.3-SNAPSHOT (or 2.0.0)
>>>> that we want, such as an OutOfMemoryError deploying to Softlayer [1].
>>>> 
>>>> It's worth hanging fire on Brooklyn 0.10.0 until we have a jclouds 1.9.3
>>>> release.
>>>> 
>>>> In the meantime, we should still get our own house in order by doing the
>>>> first of the steps below (i.e. dealing with open PRs; ensuring no-one
>> has
>>>> any imminent important contributions to make for 0.10.0, etc).
>>>> 
>>>> Aled
>>>> 
>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BROOKLYN-364
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 17/11/2016 11:37, Alex Heneveld wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> That would be a great solution Andrea!
>>>>> 
>>>>> Best
>>>>> Alex
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 17 Nov 2016 08:18, "Andrea Turli" <andrea.turli@cloudsoftcorp.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> I'm happy to volunteer for releasing an official jclouds 1.9.3 which
>> may
>>>>>> be
>>>>>> the half-house solution here.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> wdyt?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Andrea
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 17 November 2016 at 08:25, Svetoslav Neykov <
>>>>>> svetoslav.neykov@cloudsoftcorp.com> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> This is going to be the first release that actually works in Karaf.
>> The
>>>>>>> docs are still assuming classic though so I suggest we keep
>> recommending
>>>>>>> the classic distribution for 0.10.0.
>>>>>>> For next release let's plan on updating the docs and switching
the
>>>>>>> recommended distribution to the Karaf based one.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Svet.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 16.11.2016 г., at 13:22, Aled Sage <aled.sage@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> It's far past time that we did a Brooklyn 0.10.0 release!
I suggest
>> we
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> aim for that soon.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> To that end, I suggest the following steps:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> * Deal with open PRs:
>>>>>>>>    o People shout out about any PRs you think are very important
to
>>>>>>>>      be merged, before that release.
>>>>>>>>    o Review open PRs
>>>>>>>>      (for any that won't get merged into 0.10.0, clearly
mark them
>> as
>>>>>>>>      such and say why).
>>>>>>>> * Any pending/remaining work:
>>>>>>>>    o Give people until Friday evening (uk time) to submit
any other
>>>>>>>>      very important PRs that are being working on.
>>>>>>>>    o People shout out about any known issues that they see
as
>>>>>>>>      blockers for a release.
>>>>>>>> * Do some initial testing, using master (before Friday).
>>>>>>>> * Aim to produce a first release candidate on Friday evening
(uk
>> time).
>>>>>>>> * Do the usual QA/fix cycle until the release is ready.
>>>>>>>> * Write release notes, etc.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Of the first steps, reviewing the PRs is a big piece of work!
If you
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> have time to help, then please lend a hand by reviewing and/or
>> testing
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> PRs, and commenting on them.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I don't think we should try to squeeze lots of additional
PRs into
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 0.10.0 - there is already a huge amount in there compared to
0.9.0!
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Richard, are our release process docs up-to-date at [1]?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Aled
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> [1] http://brooklyn.apache.org/developers/committers/release-
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> process/index.html
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>> 
>> 


Mime
View raw message