brooklyn-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From josec <jo...@lcc.uma.es>
Subject Re: Google Summer of Code - PaaS services addition proposal
Date Thu, 22 Sep 2016 07:13:44 GMT
Hi all,

As Andrea mentioned, GSoC was closed successfully.
Thank again to Andrea and the Brooklyn community for
your support there!

I agree with Andrea, a demo would be interesting in order to
show our work and, if you would agree, continue working in the
PaaS integration. We could try to arrange meeting next week, WDYT?

Thanks Andrea for promoting this event.

Best,
Jose



El 21.09.2016 16:44, Andrea Turli escribió:
> GSoC 2016 has come to a close - thank you Jose for your great effort
> and thanks to the Brooklyn community for the opportunity!
> 
> Jose,
> I still think it would be great to arrange your demo asap so that
> others can see your work, let us know when you can and we'll help
> promoting the event.
> 
> Best,
> Andrea
> 
> On 17 August 2016 at 18:23, Jose Carrasco <josec@lcc.uma.es> wrote:
>> Richard,
>> thanks a lot for you response.
>> 
>> About the demo, I will be pleased to show our approach.
>> Andrea and me are working currently in order to close the services 
>> management.
>> We need to close a couple of questions, but we are very near. So, we 
>> reach a
>> pretty solution in a couple of days (I think). So, we will be able to 
>> organize a demo
>> and show a couple of examples and answer your questions :)
>> 
>> About, update the code. Currently I am working on a personal 
>> repository
>> in github. But I would really like to see the code in Apache or 
>> similar, my main
>> goal is during this GSoC project is to developed something that will 
>> be useful
>> for the community.
>> 
>> I would also use this opportunity to sincerely thank to Andrea his 
>> effort during
>> this period.
>> 
>> Best,
>> Jose
>> 
>> El 17/08/2016, a las 16:46, Richard Downer <richard@apache.org> 
>> escribió:
>> 
>>> Jose,
>>> 
>>> Thank you for your work on Apache Brooklyn and sharing your progress 
>>> with
>>> us. I'm not personally an expert with Cloud Foundry so I can't 
>>> comment
>>> directly on your work but you are in safe hands with Andrea :-)
>>> 
>>> There's two things that I would like to ask you (and Andrea) about. 
>>> Firstly
>>> is that I would obviously like to see this code get into an Apache 
>>> Brooklyn
>>> repository. Have you had any thoughts about the right long-term home 
>>> for
>>> this code?
>>> 
>>> Secondly, would you be wiling to give a 5-to-10 minute demo of the 
>>> work you
>>> have done? Emails are one thing but seeing something in action on 
>>> screen is
>>> really good! If you are up for this then I will see about organising 
>>> a
>>> lightning talks session for the community.
>>> 
>>> Thanks!
>>> 
>>> Richard.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 17 August 2016 at 15:38, Jose Carrasco <josec@lcc.uma.es> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi all again,
>>>> 
>>>> Andrea and me are integrating Cloud Foundry services according to 
>>>> our last
>>>> proposal description (below).
>>>> 
>>>> An entity has beed developed which represents generic Cloud Foundry
>>>> services and a more complex
>>>> entity is focuses on MySql Cloud Foundry service (
>>>> VanillaCloudFoundryApplication).
>>>> 
>>>> VanillaCloudFoundryApplication allows create an instance of a 
>>>> available
>>>> MySql service
>>>> in the Cloud Foundry Platform, as you can see in the next blueprint.
>>>> 
>>>> name: Vanilla CloudFoundry example
>>>> location: pivotal-ws
>>>> services:
>>>> - type: org.apache.brooklyn.cloudfoundry.entity.
>>>> VanillaCloudFoundryApplication
>>>>  id: vanilla-app
>>>>  brooklyn.config:
>>>>    path: 
>>>> classpath://brooklyn-example-hello-world-sql-webapp-in-paas.war
>>>>    buildpack: https://github.com/cloudfoundry/java-buildpack.git
>>>>    services:
>>>>    - $brooklyn:component("db”)
>>>>    env:
>>>>      brooklyn.example.db.url: $brooklyn:component("db").
>>>> attributeWhenReady("service.mysql.jdbc")
>>>> 
>>>> - type: org.apache.brooklyn.cloudfoundry.entity.service.
>>>> mysql.CloudFoundryMySqlService
>>>>  id: db
>>>>  brooklyn.config:
>>>>    serviceName: cleardb
>>>>    instanceName: my-cleardb-instance
>>>>    plan: spark
>>>>    creationScriptTemplateUrl: classpath://chat-database.sql
>>>> 
>>>> You can see that CloudFoundryMySqlService creates an instance of a
>>>> available mysql service (in this case cleardb),
>>>> initializes the database using a script.sql and and provides a jdbc
>>>> database address through a sensor (service.mysql.jdbc).
>>>> 
>>>> It allows services to be created by an blueprint together with the
>>>> application (which is not supported currently
>>>> by Cloud Foundry Manifest). Moreover, it is in charge of 
>>>> initializing the
>>>> database (whether may be useful for users).
>>>> 
>>>> So, we have a first working implementation of our proposal. Some 
>>>> unit and
>>>> live test have been developed and it
>>>> looks that we are taking a step in the right direction.
>>>> 
>>>> With the help of Andrea (thanks a lot for that)  I was able to solve 
>>>> some
>>>> questions about the services data management,
>>>> we would like to know your opinion about some decisions that we are 
>>>> still
>>>> considering, but let me stop here and share our
>>>> questions in a different email, in order to avoid a long and 
>>>> unreadable
>>>> mail.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks a lot.
>>>> Best,
>>>> Jose
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> El 08/08/2016, a las 14:52, Jose Carrasco <josec@lcc.uma.es> 
>>>> escribió:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>> 
>>>>> as we mentioned previously, we have a pretty entity which allows an
>>>>> application to be deployed on a Cloud Foundry platform by using a
>>>>> new paas location, CloudFoundryPaasLocation.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Here you can find a simple blueprint which shows the entity usage:
>>>>> 
>>>>> name: CloudFoundryPaasLocation configuration example
>>>>> location: pivotal-ws
>>>>> services:
>>>>> - type: org.apache.brooklyn.cloudfoundry.entity.
>>>> VanillaCloudFoundryApplication
>>>>> id: vanilla-app
>>>>> brooklyn.config:
>>>>>   name-app: name
>>>>>   path: 
>>>>> classpath://brooklyn-example-hello-world-sql-webapp-in-paas.war
>>>>>   buildpack: https://github.com/cloudfoundry/java-buildpack.git
>>>>>   domain: domain
>>>>>   host: application-host
>>>>> 
>>>>> You can find more examples in [1]. Currently, we are thinking about
>>>> supporting
>>>>> Cloud Foundry service. Documentation [2] says that an existent 
>>>>> service
>>>> can be
>>>>> bound to an application. Then, it looks interesting to use a new 
>>>>> entity
>>>> to instantiate
>>>>> a service, allowing users to create services and bind them to an
>>>> application
>>>>> from a blueprint.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Following, you can find blueprint which shows my proposal to manage 
>>>>> a
>>>> service.
>>>>> 
>>>>> name: CloudFoundryPaasLocation configuration example
>>>>> location: pivotal-ws
>>>>> services:
>>>>> - type: org.apache.brooklyn.cloudfoundry.entity.
>>>> VanillaCloudFoundryApplication
>>>>> id: vanilla-app
>>>>> brooklyn.config:
>>>>>   name-app: name
>>>>>   path: 
>>>>> classpath://brooklyn-example-hello-world-sql-webapp-in-paas.war
>>>>>   buildpack: https://github.com/cloudfoundry/java-buildpack.git
>>>>>   domain: domain
>>>>>   host: application-host
>>>>>   bind:
>>>>>   - instance_name
>>>>> 
>>>>> - type: 
>>>>> org.apache.brooklyn.cloudfoundry.entity.servies.MySqlService
>>>>> brooklyn.config:
>>>>>   service-type: available_service #which was added to the platform 
>>>>> by a
>>>> broker
>>>>>   instance-name: instance_name #used to bind the instance
>>>>>   plan: plan_to_use #offers varying levels of resources or features 
>>>>> for
>>>> the same service
>>>>>   creationScriptUrl: script.sql #script to init the database
>>>>> 
>>>>> MySqlService is an entity which allows to create an instance of any
>>>> mysql service.
>>>>> Then,  Actually, all the services are created following the same 
>>>>> method,
>>>> a service
>>>>> requires the service-type, the instance-name and the plan to be 
>>>>> created,
>>>> then it is
>>>>> possible to create any service using a generic entity. However, it 
>>>>> looks
>>>> interesting
>>>>> to create a entity for manage MySql services, because it will allow
>>>> concrete operations
>>>>> to be carried out, for example, it allows the database, which is 
>>>>> created
>>>> by the service,
>>>>> to be initialized using a script.sql.
>>>>> Currently, users have to initialize the database manually after 
>>>>> creating
>>>> the service,
>>>>> so this proposal would facilitate the management of the Cloud 
>>>>> Foundry
>>>> services.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Does it make sense for you? I will appreciate any advice and 
>>>>> suggestion
>>>> in order
>>>>> to improve this idea.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> Jose
>>>>> 
>>>>> [1] https://github.com/kiuby88/brooklyn-cloudfoundry/tree/
>>>> 48c7710f8228acf548ea54469da403ff98dc84a8/src/test/resources
>>>>> [2] https://docs.cloudfoundry.org/devguide/services/application-
>>>> binding.html#bind
>>>>> 
>>>>> El 05/08/2016, a las 19:17, Jose Carrasco <josec@lcc.uma.es> 
>>>>> escribió:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks Andrea for your report. As student I can say you are doing 
>>>>>> a
>>>> great job as mentor, I am learning a lot about software 
>>>> architectures,
>>>> patterns, and another principles to develop maintainable and 
>>>> testable code.
>>>> I really appreciate that you spend a bit of time every day to direct 
>>>> me in
>>>> the right direction.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> During this time we decided to model a PaasLocation in Brooklyn 
>>>>>> and to
>>>> target initially CF. Then we focus on understanding the CF features 
>>>> and the
>>>> CF manifest which to model what I ended up calling
>>>> VanillaCloudFoundryApplication, which models a CF manifest and it is
>>>> startable on a PaasLocation. It was necessary a lot of iterations to 
>>>> get
>>>> the current architecture. First, it was decided how the Cloud 
>>>> Foundry
>>>> services had to be managed by the location (through a client), we 
>>>> spend
>>>> quite time chatting and developing examples time reach an extensible 
>>>> and
>>>> useful and testable architecture. Once the first prototype was 
>>>> ready,
>>>> Andrea suggested to introduce the driver pattern, allowing the 
>>>> entity to
>>>> delegate the location management to an driver, what it looks 
>>>> interesting in
>>>> order to generalize our solution. Currently, we are updating the 
>>>> Cloud
>>>> Foundry client that we are using to manage the Cloud Foundry 
>>>> services, in
>>>> order to obtain a more maintainable code. Once this task will be 
>>>> ready, I
>>>> will explore how to generalize this approach to support more 
>>>> platforms
>>>> without refactoring too much the current solution.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Of course you can obtain a track and more concrete information 
>>>>>> about
>>>> each of our task in our trello [1] board. A lot of aforementioned 
>>>> decisions
>>>> can be also tracked following the open PR in [2].
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>> Jose
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> [1]: https://trello.com/b/ZFfueDsu/gsoc2016
>>>>>> [2]: https://github.com/kiuby88/brooklyn-cloudfoundry
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> El 05/08/2016, a las 17:38, Andrea Turli 
>>>>>> <andrea.turli@cloudsoftcorp.
>>>> com> escribió:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> All,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> as GSoC mentor of [1] I'm happy to say that Jose is doing very 
>>>>>>> well and
>>>>>>> he's keeping up a great job on adding PaaS support to Brooklyn
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Jose Carrasco is being very active and productive during this 
>>>>>>> period.
>>>> He is
>>>>>>> collecting his ideas and documenting his work in this folder [1]. 
>>>>>>> He's
>>>> been
>>>>>>> quite active on IRC but we have also 1:1 conversations that he's 
>>>>>>> keen
>>>> to
>>>>>>> summarize focusing with the design and the main technical 
>>>>>>> decisions
>>>> taken
>>>>>>> along the way.
>>>>>>> There is also Trello board [2] that we have reviewed with some of 
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> Brooklyn committers (Aled, Alex and Robert) Currently the code
>>>> produced for
>>>>>>> this project is available at [3] but it will be moved to an 
>>>>>>> apache
>>>> soon.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> If you are interested please let us know your thoughts/comments,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Sorry for the belated update,
>>>>>>> Andrea and Jose
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> [1]: 
>>>>>>> https://drive.google.com/a/cloudsoftcorp.com/folderview?id=0BxP_
>>>>>>> HXE8tVoFazF4cUV0LXpYSTg&usp=sharing#
>>>>>>> [2]: https://trello.com/b/ZFfueDsu/gsoc2016
>>>>>>> [3]: https://github.com/kiuby88/brooklyn-cloudfoundry
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 2 May 2016 at 13:00, Jose Carrasco <josec@lcc.uma.es> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Hi Andrea and all,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Thanks for that. I will try to review and to make some 
>>>>>>>> contributions
>>>> to
>>>>>>>> the mentioned PRs. I have
>>>>>>>> to develop the proposal that I update to Google Summer of Code,
>>>>>>>> participate in the community,
>>>>>>>> develop the documentation, etc. (as Andrea has mentioned) but It 
>>>>>>>> will
>>>> give
>>>>>>>> me great pleasure to
>>>>>>>> collaborate in different tasks, and functionality developments 
>>>>>>>> :-)
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Just a pair of questions about the proposal. I have a pair of 
>>>>>>>> ideas
>>>> about
>>>>>>>> how PaaS entities could be added to
>>>>>>>> Brooklyn (in fact, I tried a pair of PRs) . The proposal that I 
>>>>>>>> wrote
>>>> a
>>>>>>>> little description about that in the proposal
>>>>>>>> that I wrote, but I should develop some diagrams about necessary
>>>> entities,
>>>>>>>> locations and how it has to be added
>>>>>>>> to Brooklyn, then what should I do? should I write a Google 
>>>>>>>> Docs?
>>>> should I
>>>>>>>> open a PR directly? I would prefer to
>>>>>>>> write a little document before coding. What do you think?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I was a little contributor in a different open project,
>>>> brooklyn-tosca. I
>>>>>>>> tried different examples in order to find new
>>>>>>>> possible functionalities there, but I was not actively involved
>>>> either in
>>>>>>>> the community chat or in the Mailing List.
>>>>>>>> I do not want to be a spammer. Probably my routine should be
>>>> different for
>>>>>>>> GSoC, I should ask more questions
>>>>>>>> about new functionalities and how they should be implemented 
>>>>>>>> before
>>>>>>>> coding. Does the community use gitter?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> In other words, I am still a novice here and I have much to 
>>>>>>>> learn.
>>>> Hence,
>>>>>>>> I will  appreciate any advice and suggestion
>>>>>>>> in order to improve my participation in the project.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Thanks a lot.
>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>> Jose
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> El 02/05/2016, a las 11:36, Andrea Turli 
>>>>>>>> <andrea.turli@cloudsoftcorp.
>>>> com>
>>>>>>>> escribió:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Hi Jose,
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> We are now in the "Community Bonding Period (April 22 - May 
>>>>>>>>> 22)". The
>>>>>>>>> Community Bonding period is intended to get students ready to 
>>>>>>>>> start
>>>>>>>>> contributing to your organization full time in May.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> We encourage you to try to become familiar with the community
>>>> practices
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>> processes: participate on Mailing Lists / IRC and ask 
>>>>>>>>> questions!
>>>>>>>>> Set up their development environment: following
>>>>>>>>> https://brooklyn.apache.org/v/latest/dev/index.html
>>>>>>>>> Try to participate in code reviews for others. There is a
>>>> documentation
>>>>>>>> PR
>>>>>>>>> open right now [1] or a small PR on brooklyn-server [2] you may 
>>>>>>>>> want
>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> test to report your feedback or [3] in brooklyn-libray.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Ideally code review should become part of your daily routine, 
>>>>>>>>> but of
>>>>>>>>> course, reading (and updating!) documentation and contributing 
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>> mailing
>>>>>>>>> list / IRC will be appreciated as well.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>> Andrea
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> [1]: https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-docs/pull/49
>>>>>>>>> [2]: https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-server/pull/127
>>>>>>>>> [3]: https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-library/pull/32
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On 24 April 2016 at 22:00, Aled Sage <aled.sage@gmail.com> 
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> That's awesome - looking forward to you working on this, Jose!
>>>> Please do
>>>>>>>>>> keep the dev@brooklyn list informed of proposals, progress,
>>>> questions,
>>>>>>>>>> comments, etc. I'm sure that Andrea, myself and the rest of 
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> community
>>>>>>>>>> will be very happy to give opinions and help as appropriate.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Aled
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On 23/04/2016 00:01, Jose wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all!!
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks a lot to all of you in particular to my GSoC mentor,
>>>> Andrea. I
>>>>>>>> am
>>>>>>>>>>> really looking forward to start :-)
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you very much
>>>>>>>>>>> JoseEl 22/4/2016 23:21, Andrea Turli 
>>>>>>>>>>> <andrea.turli@cloudsoftcorp.
>>>> com>
>>>>>>>>>>> escribió:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Good news for Brooklyn: the proposal got accepted [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Congratulations Jose!
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrea
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/dashboard/
>>>>>>>> organization/5694656234913792/proposal/6531111119224832/
>>>>>>>>>>>> Il 14/apr/2016 11:10, "Jose Carrasco" <josec@lcc.uma.es> ha
>>>> scritto:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Andrea and all,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> sorry, I wrote “I hope that this link about Apache 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ranking
>>>> process is
>>>>>>>>>>>>> useful” but I did not put the link there.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let me add the link here [1]. Probably, Google should score 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> some
>>>>>>>>>>>>> proposal
>>>>>>>>>>>>> aspects but I would say that the mentor and the community 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> should
>>>> also
>>>>>>>>>>>>> complete some documentation. In any case, I hope this task 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> is not
>>>>>>>>>>>>> painful
>>>>>>>>>>>>> for you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jose
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://community.apache.org/mentee-ranking-process.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> El 14/04/2016, a las 09:45, Andrea Turli <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> andrea.turli@cloudsoftcorp.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> escribió:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jose,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thanks for the reminder.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Reading https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/how-it-works/ 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd
>>>> say
>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GSoC commission will score the projects and will assign 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accepted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mentors by April 22nd.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrea
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14 April 2016 at 01:02, Jose Carrasco 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <josec@lcc.uma.es>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Firstly, I would like to thank all of you, specially to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrea
>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aled,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the effort from your side.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would like to remind the deadline description which was 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sent
>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aled:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * 2016-04-12: Proposals to ASF projects must be reviewed
>>>> roughly
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have a potential mentor so that we know how many slots to
>>>> request.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Proposals that don't have a mentor at this point will be
>>>>>>>> down-rated.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * 2016-04-18: Proposal scoring must be completed. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Proposals
>>>>>>>> without a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> score will be rejected, no exceptions.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * 2016-04-22: Accepted student proposals announced on the
>>>> Google
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Summer of Code site.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The proposal should be scoring by my mentor and the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> community
>>>> (I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> before 2016-04-18. Please, feel free to read and score 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>> proposal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> according your priorities and requirements. Probably, you 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>> found a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> form
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and the required documentation in your Web GSoC 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Application
>>>> side. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hope
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that this link about Apache ranking process is useful for 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you.
>>>> In
>>>>>>>> any
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> case,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am looking forward to hearing from you and do not 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hesitate to
>>>> ask
>>>>>>>> any
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> question you have. I am really happy with this and I, of
>>>> course,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> understand
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you need to review in depth the proposal and to take a 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> decision.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks again.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jose
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> El 13/04/2016, a las 08:57, Andrea Turli <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> andrea.turli@cloudsoftcorp.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> escribió:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jose,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm indeed happy to mentor you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will try to add myself as a mentor and will update you
>>>> shortly.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrea
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12 April 2016 at 23:48, Jose Carrasco 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <josec@lcc.uma.es>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi again,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I found this link about becoming a mentor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://community.apache.org/guide-to-being-a-mentor.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jose
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> El 12/04/2016, a las 23:44, Jose Carrasco 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <josec@lcc.uma.es>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> escribió:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I do not have any link. I uploaded my proposal from a
>>>> standard
>>>>>>>> form
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the web and I selected Apache as a form’s field.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I only have this link
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://community.apache.org/gsoc.html#applying-for-gsoc
>>>> but I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already know it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (I sent you in a private email the think to the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> proposal).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jose
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> El 12/04/2016, a las 23:39, Aled Sage 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <aled.sage@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> escribió:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Jose,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The timeline on 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://community.apache.org/gsoc.html
>>>> says
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> next
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> steps are:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * 2016-04-12: Proposals to ASF projects must be 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reviewed
>>>> roughly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have a potential mentor so that we know how many 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> slots to
>>>>>>>> request.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Proposals that don't have a mentor at this point will 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> down-rated.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * 2016-04-18: Proposal scoring must be completed. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Proposals
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> without
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> score will be rejected, no exceptions.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * 2016-04-22: Accepted student proposals announced on 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> Google
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Summer of Code site.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you have a link (on the Apache site) to the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> application
>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> submitted?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aled
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/04/2016 22:33, Jose Carrasco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Aled.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will be very happy to work with Andrea Turli :-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I cannot selected  a mentor and I can not see any 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> assigned
>>>>>>>> mentor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my web profile,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> probably it may be added from Apache organization web
>>>> profile.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Today it is the last day? Probably an extension will 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> available a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pair of days (I hope). Let me know if I need to do
>>>> something,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or sending more information.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks a lot for your reply.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jose
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> El 12/04/2016, a las 23:24, Aled Sage <
>>>> aled.sage@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> escribió:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Jose,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for this - sounds like a great idea. I'm 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sure the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> community
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (myself included) will be very happy to support it!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I believe the next step is that you need a mentor in 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> Brooklyn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> community. I know that Andrea Turli would be happy 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>> volunteer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> spoke to him offline).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> According to the timeline on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://community.apache.org/gsoc.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /2016-04-12: Proposals to ASF projects must be reviewed
>>>> roughly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have a potential mentor so that we know how many slots to
>>>> request.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Proposals that don't have a mentor at this point 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> down-rated./
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you therefore ensure that your application says you 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mentor, ideally updating it today? (I'm not sure 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> process is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aled
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/04/2016 12:31, Jose Carrasco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am Jose Carrasco (a.k.a kiuby88).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am very interesting on adding PaaS platform 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> support
>>>> to the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Brooklyn project. I have already forked brooklyn
>>>> projects and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> developed some first approaches to add CloudFoundry to
>>>> Brooklyn.
>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> opened
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some PRs, and I obtained an excellent feedback. I would 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like
>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> update
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PRs but I am very busy with the SeaClouds European
>>>> open-project.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I do think PaaS support could be a good feature, and I 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>> like
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> continue that work. Because of that, I applied to Google
>>>> Summer of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Code
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache organization. I updated a proposal about PaaS 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> services
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> addition
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Brooklyn. I think it is a great opportunity. I know 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Brooklyn a
>>>>>>>> quite
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> well
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (because I have develop some new entities for 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SeaClouds), and
>>>> I
>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> also
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collaborated on cloudsoft/brooklyn-tosca project. I am 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> really
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> interested on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this. Probably I should have written previously to the
>>>> application
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google Summer of Code, but I decided it too late and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> application’s
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deadline was so close..  I do not know if I can put the
>>>> proposal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> link
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> here.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But if you are interesting I will be happy send it to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am looking forward to hearing from you and do not
>>>> hesitate to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ask
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any question you have.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jose Carrasco
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>> 

Mime
View raw message