Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D4B0200B64 for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 14:52:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 3BCF2160A8C; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 12:52:11 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id AAB8A160A76 for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 14:52:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 57324 invoked by uid 500); 2 Aug 2016 12:52:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@brooklyn.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@brooklyn.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@brooklyn.apache.org Received: (qmail 57313 invoked by uid 99); 2 Aug 2016 12:52:09 -0000 Received: from git1-us-west.apache.org (HELO git1-us-west.apache.org) (140.211.11.23) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Aug 2016 12:52:09 +0000 Received: by git1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at git1-us-west.apache.org, from userid 33) id 8A3BCE0007; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 12:52:09 +0000 (UTC) From: drigodwin To: dev@brooklyn.apache.org Reply-To: dev@brooklyn.apache.org References: In-Reply-To: Subject: [GitHub] brooklyn-docs pull request #98: Improve location docs Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <20160802125209.8A3BCE0007@git1-us-west.apache.org> Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 12:52:09 +0000 (UTC) archived-at: Tue, 02 Aug 2016 12:52:11 -0000 Github user drigodwin commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-docs/pull/98#discussion_r73148373 --- Diff: guide/ops/locations/_AWS.md --- @@ -111,3 +125,15 @@ You can then deploy blueprints to the subnet, allowing VPC hardware instance typ by specifying the subnet ID as the `networkName` in your YAML blueprint. This is covered in the previous section, "Using Subnets". + +### Tidying up after jclouds + +Security groups are not always deleted by jclouds. This is due to a limitation in AWS (see +https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-207). In brief, AWS prevents the security group +being deleted until there are no VMs using it. However, there is eventual consistency for +recording which VMs still reference those security groups: after deleting the VM, it can sometimes +take several minutes before the security group can be deleted. jclouds retries for 3 seconds, but +does not block for longer. + +There is utility written by Cloudsoft for deleting these unused resources: +http://www.cloudsoftcorp.com/blog/2013/03/tidying-up-after-jclouds. --- End diff -- This URL is no longer valid --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---