brooklyn-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From John McCabe <j...@johnmccabe.net>
Subject Re: Naming of Brooklyn Client on OSX Homebrew
Date Mon, 23 May 2016 07:59:22 GMT
I like that !

On Mon, 23 May 2016 at 08:58 Thomas Bouron <thomas.bouron@cloudsoftcorp.com>
wrote:

> Hey John.
>
> So if I'm understanding correctly this PR, this is to install the CLI via
> brew right? So why not using a simple brooklyn-cli?
>
> Best
>
> On Mon, 23 May 2016, 08:53 John McCabe, <john@johnmccabe.net> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I've currently got a pull request in against Homebrew/homebrew-core#1326
> > <https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-core/issues/1326> to add the
> > Brooklyn
> > CLI to brew.
> >
> > There's a reluctance however to add a `br` alias due to it being 'too
> > generic', one alternative is to just go with the repo name - for example:
> >
> >   brew install brooklyn-client
> >
> > This would still install the br cli.
> >
> > The current dist archive is `apache-brooklyn-client-cli` for example
> > (stripping the version out), I don't see a dedicated RPM/Deb for the
> client
> > but assume it would follow the same convention (* as an aside, is the
> -cli
> > really necessary, do we expect to distribute other clients?)
> >
> > Any suggestions/objections on the above alternative?
> >
> > /John
> >
> > ps. What is the status of getting linux packages into Debian/Fedora repos
> > etc? What package naming will be used.
> >
> --
>
> Thomas Bouron • Software Engineer @ Cloudsoft Corporation •
> http://www.cloudsoftcorp.com/
> Github: https://github.com/tbouron
> Twitter: https://twitter.com/eltibouron
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message