brooklyn-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Richard Downer <rich...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache Brooklyn 0.9.0 [rc2]
Date Wed, 06 Apr 2016 20:50:42 GMT
Thanks Aled. I'm kicking off rc3 just now.

Richard.


On 6 April 2016 at 20:43, Aled Sage <aled.sage@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've reviewed and tested John's brooklyn-dist PR #31: looks good, so merged
> into master and 0.9.0.
>
> ---
> As discussed offline, in the vote email we'll want to include checksums of
> the individual brooklyn-client artifacts. This is because we want to include
> them as individually downloadable artifacts, so that someone visiting [1]
> can download the specific cli binary for their platform (rather than having
> to download the zip of all of them, unzip it, and then get the right
> artifact).
>
> Richard: over to you to make sure we comply with Apache for this, and to
> produce the next release candidate.
>
> Aled
>
> [1] http://brooklyn.apache.org/download/index.html
>
>
>
> On 06/04/2016 18:31, Aled Sage wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Sam,
>>
>> That is now cherry-picked into 0.9.0. Agree it is low-risk and worth
>> including.
>>
>> ---
>> Can someone please review and test John's
>> https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-dist/pull/31? It looks low risk and
>> simple.
>>
>> Aled
>>
>>
>> On 06/04/2016 17:29, Sam Corbett wrote:
>>>
>>> If I've not missed the cutoff I'd like
>>> https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-server/pull/99 to be included.
>>>
>>> On 6 April 2016 at 17:19, Richard Downer <richard@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 6 April 2016 at 17:17, Aled Sage <aled.sage@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I believe that Richard is discussing which Geoff about which
>>>>
>>>> brooklyn-client
>>>>>
>>>>> platform artifacts are required. Once that is agreed and sorted, then
I
>>>>> think we are good to go.
>>>>
>>>> I've checked Geoff's PR and it's nice and simple: Mac 64bit, Windows
>>>> and Linux 32bit. The 32bit executables execute on 64bit machines so
>>>> there's no benefit to 64bit artifacts. To the best of my knowledge
>>>> there has never been a 32-bit Intel-based Mac, and even if there was,
>>>> it's obsolete.
>>>>
>>>> So it's ready to go IMO.
>>>>
>>
>

Mime
View raw message