brooklyn-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alex Heneveld <alex.henev...@cloudsoftcorp.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Accept contribution of Brooklyn CLI
Date Thu, 18 Feb 2016 18:33:01 GMT

+1 binding

Alex

On 18/02/2016 18:14, Svetoslav Neykov wrote:
> +1 binding
>
> Svet.
>
>
>> On 18.02.2016 г., at 18:09, Duncan Johnston Watt <duncan.johnstonwatt@cloudsoftcorp.com>
wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> Duncan Johnston-Watt
>> CEO | Cloudsoft Corporation
>>
>> Twitter | @duncanjw
>> Mobile | +44 777 190 2653
>> Skype | duncan_johnstonwatt
>> Linkedin | www.linkedin.com/in/duncanjohnstonwatt
>>
>> On 18 February 2016 at 15:25, Richard Downer <richard@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> All,
>>>
>>> https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-client/pull/1 adds the Brooklyn
>>> CLI. This allows a user to control and script Brooklyn from the
>>> command line. It opens up many possibilities, including making the web
>>> UI optional (reducing the security footprint in production
>>> deployments), allowing admins to script Brooklyn using shell scripts,
>>> and simplifies our getting started tutorials. It's a very compelling
>>> addition to the Brooklyn project.
>>>
>>> The CLI was developed in a non-Apache location starting last year,
>>> with the bulk of development happening from November onwards. It has
>>>> 150 commits from 4 authors and is over 6,000 SLOC. Given the size of
>>> the contribution, it is prudent to follow Apache's IP clearance
>>> process before merging the PR.
>>>
>>> This vote is to discover if the Brooklyn PMC and community are in
>>> favour of accepting this contribution. If the vote passes, the PMC and
>>> the authors of the code will work together to complete Apache's IP
>>> Clearance process and merge the code for the CLI.
>>>
>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours (i.e. 15:30 UTC on Sunday
>>> 21st February 2016)
>>>
>>> [ ] +1, accept contribution of the Brooklyn CLI into the project
>>> [ ] 0, no opinion
>>> [ ] -1, reject contribution because...
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Richard.
>>>


Mime
View raw message