brooklyn-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (BROOKLYN-190) Upgrade to Jetty9
Date Fri, 06 Nov 2015 22:24:11 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BROOKLYN-190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14994573#comment-14994573
] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on BROOKLYN-190:
-----------------------------------------

Github user CMoH commented on the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/incubator-brooklyn/pull/997#issuecomment-154560691
  
    It seems that we are both right. By adding an `invocationCount` parameter to the test
under question I've found that "sometimes" we get `SocketException`, and sometimes `SSLHandshakeException`.
I've tracked the problem down to a (theoretical) flaw in the way `org.apache.http.conn.ssl.SSLSocketFactory`
handles SSL socket connections. However, it may be that this race is visible only when both
ends of the socket are on the same host, or (as in our test case) within the same process.


> Upgrade to Jetty9
> -----------------
>
>                 Key: BROOKLYN-190
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BROOKLYN-190
>             Project: Brooklyn
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 0.8.0, 0.9.0
>            Reporter: Ciprian Ciubotariu
>            Assignee: Ciprian Ciubotariu
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 0.9.0
>
>
> According to [1] jetty9 is now the stable version.
> In relation to BROOKLYN-183, current stable pax-web 4.x series also support Jetty9 (although
I believe it can be used with Jetty8 as well). However, migrating Brooklyn to a more current
Jetty version seems preferable.
> [1] http://www.eclipse.org/jetty/documentation/current/what-jetty-version.html



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message