brooklyn-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Robert Moss <robert.m...@cloudsoftcorp.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Create repo for new deliverable: CLI
Date Thu, 26 Nov 2015 17:41:32 GMT
sorry, Hadrian, just read your message on [DISCUSS] I'll not confuse things
with a "+0"

+1 brooklyn-cli


On 26 November 2015 at 17:13, Robert Moss <robert.moss@cloudsoftcorp.com>
wrote:

> +1 new repo
> +0 named brooklyn-client
>
> On 26 November 2015 at 10:32, Guglielmo Nigri <
> guglielmo.nigri@cloudsoftcorp.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 separate repo for the go language CLI
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 26 November 2015 at 01:56, Mike Zaccardo <
>> mike.zaccardo@cloudsoftcorp.com
>> > wrote:
>>
>> > +1 brooklyn-client in a sep. repo
>> >
>> > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 4:01 PM Geoff Macartney <
>> > geoff.macartney@cloudsoftcorp.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > + 1 on separate repo
>> > > +1 for brooklyn-client
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > ————————————————————
>> > > Gnu PGP key - http://is.gd/TTTTuI
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > > On 25 Nov 2015, at 20:57, David Lloyd <
>> david.lloyd@cloudsoftcorp.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > +1 for the change to brooklyn-client
>> > > >
>> > > > On 25 November 2015 at 17:55, Hadrian Zbarcea <hzbarcea@gmail.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >> There are two parts for this vote, one the creation of a *separate*
>> > > repo,
>> > > >> second the *name* of the repo. The name of the repo matters less
>> than
>> > > the
>> > > >> name of the delivered artifact and I agree that brooklyn-client
is
>> > > slightly
>> > > >> more expressive than cli.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> +1 on the change. Agree we don't need another vote, unless the
>> change
>> > > will
>> > > >> create contention, which is not likely imho, given the nature
of
>> the
>> > > >> amendment.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Cheers,
>> > > >> Hadrian
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> On 11/25/2015 12:37 PM, Alex Heneveld wrote:
>> > > >>
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> Changing vote:
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>     +1 brooklyn-client
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> If you've voted and you like this please consider changing!
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> I know there are other types of clients (jsgui, stubs) but
there
>> are
>> > > >>> other CLI's also (e.g. server-cli).  brooklyn-client-cli would
be
>> > > >>> possible, but I think the CLI is what we want to emphasise,
and in
>> > the
>> > > >>> interest of simplicity the following feels pretty good and
has a
>> nice
>> > > >>> symmetry:
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> * brooklyn-server
>> > > >>> * brooklyn-client
>> > > >>> * brooklyn-ui
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> (Detailed updated discuss and vote for repos to follow.)
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> Best
>> > > >>> Alex
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> On 24/11/2015 15:00, Andrea Turli wrote:
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>> +1 brooklyn-cli
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>> On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 at 15:59 David Lloyd <
>> > > david.lloyd@cloudsoftcorp.com>
>> > > >>>> wrote:
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>> +1 brooklyn-cli
>> > > >>>>>
>> > > >>>>> On 24 November 2015 at 14:05, Mark McKenna
>> > > >>>>> <mark.mckenna@cloudsoftcorp.com
>> > > >>>>> wrote:
>> > > >>>>>
>> > > >>>>> +1: brooklyn-cli
>> > > >>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>> On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 at 14:04 Aled Sage <aled.sage@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > > >>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>> +1: brooklyn-cli
>> > > >>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>> On 24/11/2015 13:59, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>> > > >>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>> Brooklyners,
>> > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>> Given the feedback on the [HEADS-UP] thread
to David and
>> Geoff's
>> > > >>>>>>>> proposal, I move to starting a vote for
the creation of a
>> > separate
>> > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>> git
>> > > >>>>>
>> > > >>>>>> repo: brooklyn-cli. Tthe vote is both for the
creation of the
>> > repo,
>> > > >>>>>>>> and its name. The name with the largest
number of vote wins,
>> > > unless
>> > > >>>>>>>> strong objections will send us back to
the drawing board.
>> This
>> > > vote
>> > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>> is
>> > > >>>>>
>> > > >>>>>> *not* for the name of the executable (br or bk).
>> > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>> [+1] brooklyn-cli (create repo with this
name: a heneveld
>> > > proposal)
>> > > >>>>>>>> [+1] brooklyn-commons-cli (create repo
with this name:
>> mzaccardo
>> > > >>>>>>>> proposal)
>> > > >>>>>>>> [-1] we do not need a separate repo
>> > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>> Please cast your vote. The vote is open
for 72+ hours.
>> > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>> Cheers,
>> > > >>>>>>>> Hadrian
>> > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>> --
>> > > >>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>> *Mark McKenna*
>> > > >>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>> *Twitter :: @m4rkmckenna <https://twitter.com/m4rkmckenna>*
>> > > >>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>> *PGP :: public-key
>> > > >>>>>> <
>> https://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x2B5DC759B1EB76A7
>> > >*
>> > > >>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>
>> > > >>>
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message