brooklyn-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Robert Moss <robert.m...@cloudsoftcorp.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Create repo for new deliverable: CLI
Date Thu, 26 Nov 2015 17:13:55 GMT
+1 new repo
+0 named brooklyn-client

On 26 November 2015 at 10:32, Guglielmo Nigri <
guglielmo.nigri@cloudsoftcorp.com> wrote:

> +1 separate repo for the go language CLI
>
>
>
>
> On 26 November 2015 at 01:56, Mike Zaccardo <
> mike.zaccardo@cloudsoftcorp.com
> > wrote:
>
> > +1 brooklyn-client in a sep. repo
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 4:01 PM Geoff Macartney <
> > geoff.macartney@cloudsoftcorp.com> wrote:
> >
> > > + 1 on separate repo
> > > +1 for brooklyn-client
> > >
> > >
> > > ————————————————————
> > > Gnu PGP key - http://is.gd/TTTTuI
> > >
> > >
> > > > On 25 Nov 2015, at 20:57, David Lloyd <david.lloyd@cloudsoftcorp.com
> >
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > +1 for the change to brooklyn-client
> > > >
> > > > On 25 November 2015 at 17:55, Hadrian Zbarcea <hzbarcea@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> There are two parts for this vote, one the creation of a *separate*
> > > repo,
> > > >> second the *name* of the repo. The name of the repo matters less
> than
> > > the
> > > >> name of the delivered artifact and I agree that brooklyn-client is
> > > slightly
> > > >> more expressive than cli.
> > > >>
> > > >> +1 on the change. Agree we don't need another vote, unless the
> change
> > > will
> > > >> create contention, which is not likely imho, given the nature of the
> > > >> amendment.
> > > >>
> > > >> Cheers,
> > > >> Hadrian
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On 11/25/2015 12:37 PM, Alex Heneveld wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Changing vote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>     +1 brooklyn-client
> > > >>>
> > > >>> If you've voted and you like this please consider changing!
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I know there are other types of clients (jsgui, stubs) but there
> are
> > > >>> other CLI's also (e.g. server-cli).  brooklyn-client-cli would
be
> > > >>> possible, but I think the CLI is what we want to emphasise, and
in
> > the
> > > >>> interest of simplicity the following feels pretty good and has
a
> nice
> > > >>> symmetry:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> * brooklyn-server
> > > >>> * brooklyn-client
> > > >>> * brooklyn-ui
> > > >>>
> > > >>> (Detailed updated discuss and vote for repos to follow.)
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Best
> > > >>> Alex
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On 24/11/2015 15:00, Andrea Turli wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> +1 brooklyn-cli
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 at 15:59 David Lloyd <
> > > david.lloyd@cloudsoftcorp.com>
> > > >>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> +1 brooklyn-cli
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> On 24 November 2015 at 14:05, Mark McKenna
> > > >>>>> <mark.mckenna@cloudsoftcorp.com
> > > >>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> +1: brooklyn-cli
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 at 14:04 Aled Sage <aled.sage@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> +1: brooklyn-cli
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> On 24/11/2015 13:59, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> Brooklyners,
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> Given the feedback on the [HEADS-UP] thread
to David and
> Geoff's
> > > >>>>>>>> proposal, I move to starting a vote for the
creation of a
> > separate
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> git
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> repo: brooklyn-cli. Tthe vote is both for the creation
of the
> > repo,
> > > >>>>>>>> and its name. The name with the largest number
of vote wins,
> > > unless
> > > >>>>>>>> strong objections will send us back to the
drawing board. This
> > > vote
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> is
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> *not* for the name of the executable (br or bk).
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> [+1] brooklyn-cli (create repo with this name:
a heneveld
> > > proposal)
> > > >>>>>>>> [+1] brooklyn-commons-cli (create repo with
this name:
> mzaccardo
> > > >>>>>>>> proposal)
> > > >>>>>>>> [-1] we do not need a separate repo
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> Please cast your vote. The vote is open for
72+ hours.
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> Cheers,
> > > >>>>>>>> Hadrian
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> --
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> *Mark McKenna*
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> *Twitter :: @m4rkmckenna <https://twitter.com/m4rkmckenna>*
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> *PGP :: public-key
> > > >>>>>> <
> https://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x2B5DC759B1EB76A7
> > >*
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message