brooklyn-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Aled Sage <>
Subject Re: Prepare 0.8.0-M1 ?
Date Mon, 31 Aug 2015 16:55:04 GMT

We should aim for a 0.8.0 release candidate soon as well.

What else do we need after an M1 before we can have 0.8.0? Should we 
just go straight for 0.8.0?!


On 31/08/2015 17:31, Alex Heneveld wrote:
> Hi folks,
> Now that the package rename is pretty much done, I'd like to get an 
> 080-M1 out, maybe kick this off tomorrow?
> This will be nice for users who have been disrupted by the rename!!
> With #873 ready for review we can even offer backwards compatibility 
> for persisted state, although any user java code will have to have 
> imports optimized (or if you prefer, run a `sed -i` over the code 
> based on `` -- we should document 
> this in the release notes -- any volunteers for that?).
> We'll go through the existing PR's and finish the scan of plans/docs 
> (as discussed at #873), but if there are any other pieces of work let 
> us know.
> @Hadrian -- are there more renames to come to remove the OSGi split 
> packages?
> Best
> Alex

Cloudsoft Corporation Limited, Registered in Scotland No: SC349230. 
 Registered Office: 13 Dryden Place, Edinburgh, EH9 1RP
This e-mail message is confidential and for use by the addressee only. If 
the message is received by anyone other than the addressee, please return 
the message to the sender by replying to it and then delete the message 
from your computer. Internet e-mails are not necessarily secure. Cloudsoft 
Corporation Limited does not accept responsibility for changes made to this 
message after it was sent.

Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to avoid the transmission of 
viruses, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that the 
onward transmission, opening or use of this message and any attachments 
will not adversely affect its systems or data. No responsibility is 
accepted by Cloudsoft Corporation Limited in this regard and the recipient 
should carry out such virus and other checks as it considers appropriate.

View raw message