brooklyn-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alex Heneveld <alex.henev...@cloudsoftcorp.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Release Apache Brooklyn 0.7.0-M2-incubating [rc1]
Date Wed, 12 Nov 2014 22:45:29 GMT

Aled-

 > I've just spotted, should our LICENSE file contain a copy of each of 
the licenses mentioned in the NOTICE file?
 > (it doesn't include all of them).

It should include all, and it did include all when I went through it.  
Let's either add the new licenses or remove
where they only apply to config files where the license terms are weaker.

I think this means cancelling the VOTE again.  :)

Best
Alex



On 12/11/2014 16:45, Aled Sage wrote:
> (Is this right to have a separate [DISCUSS] thread (I'm copying what 
> was done in jclouds).
>
> The differences from rc0 are:
>
>  * GPL and LGPL references removed from NOTICE, having confirmed with
>    reviewed the relevant config files and discussed with JBoss.
>  * General tidy of NOTICE file.
>  * General tidy of comments in pom.xml about RAT exclusions.
>
> ---
> I've just spotted, should our LICENSE file contain a copy of each of 
> the licenses mentioned in the NOTICE file?
> (it doesn't include all of them).
> It does say:
>
>    OTHER LICENSES
>
>    This software incorporates minor components developed elsewhere, as
>    described in
>    the accompanying NOTICE file. In addition to the Apache License 2.0
>    (above),
>    the other licenses referenced there under which those components are
>    used are:
>
> and then gives the MIT and New BSD licenses.
>
> ---
>
> Feedback much appreciated!
>
> ====
>
> **
>
> *Checklist (all items optional, mark only those personally verified):*
>
> *
>
> [*Y*] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
>
> [*Y*] Expanded source archive matches contents of RC tag.
>
> [*Y*] Expanded source archive builds and passes tests.
>
> [**] LICENSE is present and correct.
>
> [ ] NOTICE is present and correct, including copyright date.
>
> [ ] All files have license headers where appropriate.
>
> [ ] All dependencies have compatible licenses.
>
> [ ] No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
>
> [*Y*] I follow this project's commits list.
>
> *
>
>
> On 12/11/2014 16:20, Aled Sage wrote:
>> This is to call for a vote for the source release of Apache Brooklyn 
>> 0.7.0-M2-incubating (RC1).
>>
>> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc can be found at:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brooklyn/apache-brooklyn-0.7.0-M2-incubating-rc1

>>
>>
>> The Git commit ID is edcf928ee65cc29a84376c822759e468a9f016fe
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-brooklyn.git;a=commit;h=edcf928ee65cc29a84376c822759e468a9f016fe

>>
>>
>> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/aledsage.asc
>>
>> Checksums of apache-brooklyn-0.7.0-M2-incubating-rc0.tar.gz:
>> MD5: 9859ca752042e84c3381cc977623197a
>> SHA1: 449d2f375f2b61aa8430d56687b9817019bdf18f
>> SHA256: 5b4874527c32ef61b18d7d4bed4663a777dcd18bae3ed20662d022d92cfc1f76
>>
>> KEYS file available here:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/brooklyn/KEYS
>>
>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Brooklyn 
>> 0.7.0-M2-incubating.
>>
>> The vote will be open for 72 hours.
>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Brooklyn 0.7.0-M2-incubating
>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Aled Sage
>
>


Mime
View raw message