brooklyn-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Aled Sage <>
Subject Re: Phasing out Java 6 support.
Date Wed, 13 Aug 2014 14:37:09 GMT
Hi Svet,

I recently asked one Brooklyn enterprise customer if Java 6 was 
important to them - they said no.
We need a few more data points to see if any major enterprise customers 
will be requiring Java 6.

I expect we can go with option 2 (i.e. drop Java 6 support in approx 6 
I agree we need to communicate this to our users.

For groovy-compiler, I'd love to see all our Groovy go but it's still a 
slow process to convert the remaining tests written in Groovy.
Short term, we should upgrade the groovy compiler version. There's no 
reason to still be on groovy 1.8.x that I'm aware of.
It's just tests, so should not impact any production code.


On 13/08/2014 14:20, Svetoslav Neykov wrote:
> JClouds won't be supporting Java 6 starting with next release (2.0.0) (see
> the commit [1] and the PR that merged it [2]). Given their release history
> so far it seems plausible that we can expect the new version beginning of
> next year.
> Seems like a good time to discuss what our plans for Java 6 should be:
>      1) Try to support Java 6 as long as possible, sticking to jclouds-0.8.0?
>           According to the Oracle's site Java 6 doesn't receive public
> updates since Feb 2013. Commercial support is still ongoing (see [3]).
>           IBM's Java 6 is still supported until Sep 2017 (see [4]).
>      2) Migrate to jclouds-2.0.0 as soon as it is released, communicating a
> roadmap for deprecating Java 6 to our users?
>      3) Support both JClouds versions in parallel, targeting Java 6 in the
> meantime?
> Whatever we choose looks like we will get a rough idea how long we will
> stick with Java 6 which we should explicitly document on the website.
> The Java 8 support is a related topic. Currently we can run on it, but the
> project doesn't compile due to the eclipse-groovy-compiler not supporting
> Java 8. My understanding is that Java 8 support won't be included in the 1.8
> compiler version which we currently use. We can either port the existing
> Groovy files to the latest compiler or convert them to Java.
> What are your thoughts?
> Best,
> Svet.
> [1]
> 0d00905ca
> [2]
> [3]
> [4]

View raw message