brooklyn-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrea Turli <andrea.tu...@cloudsoftcorp.com>
Subject Re: Next release?
Date Wed, 02 Jul 2014 11:15:37 GMT
Hi all,

do we also need to remove the @author from javadoc as I've seen in other
apache projects?
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/jclouds-dev/201406.mbox/%3C20140605170609.GA3566%40sherlock%3E

HTH,
Andrea


On 2 July 2014 12:58, Richard Downer <richard@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi Aled,
>
> I'm working on that list at the moment. The first priority was the
> name of the release[1]
>
> Richard.
>
> [1]http://youtu.be/cywy4soWg2A
>
> On 2 July 2014 11:46, Aled Sage <aled.sage@gmail.com> wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > Richard, what is on the list of things we still need to do for an
> > Apache-compliant release?
> >
> > Aled
> >
> >
> >
> > On 02/07/2014 11:42, Alex Heneveld wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> M2 ASAP and GA soon after.
> >>
> >> There are so many great new features!
> >>
> >> --A
> >>
> >>
> >> On 02/07/2014 11:33, Richard Downer wrote:
> >>>
> >>> We should start thinking about making a release. It's an important
> >>> milestone in incubation; there will also likely be quite a bit of
> >>> working involved in getting our codebase and our procedures compliant
> >>> to Apache standard, and will probably be one or two mis-steps along
> >>> the way. So I would like to start planning our next release as soon as
> >>> possible. We have also added several major new features recently and
> >>> it would be great to get these out of SNAPSHOTs and into something
> >>> that we can put on the front page of the website!
> >>>
> >>> The first question is what our next release would be. It could be
> >>> 0.7.0-M2-incubating - or it could be a GA version, 0.7.0-incubating.
> >>>
> >>> While we've collectively made great progress towards our goals for a
> >>> 0.7.0 GA, it may be better to give ourselves a bit of breathing space
> >>> and commence with an M2 release. This means we can concentrate on
> >>> getting a good Apache-compliant release, and save filling in the
> >>> missing GA-required features until afterwards.
> >>>
> >>> What are peoples thoughts?
> >>>
> >>> Richard.
> >>
> >>
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message