brooklyn-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Kennedy <andrew.kenn...@cloudsoftcorp.com>
Subject Re: CI for Brooklyn
Date Mon, 30 Jun 2014 20:01:17 GMT
Any objections (or other ideas) about sending results of failing builds on
Jenkins to the list?

Andrew.

-- 
-- andrew kennedy ? engineer : http://cloudsoftcorp.com/developers/ ;


On 30 June 2014 18:45, Andrew Kennedy <andrew.kennedy@cloudsoftcorp.com>
wrote:

> OK,
>
> I've added a basic Maven build of the master branch to the ASF Jenkins
> server, and placed it in a 'Brooklyn' view. You can view the results here:
>
> - https://builds.apache.org/job/incubator-brooklyn-master-build/
> - https://builds.apache.org/view/A-D/view/Brooklyn/
>
> Any new job that starts with `incubator-brooklyn-` will be included in the
> list of jobs in the Brooklyn view.
>
> I have also updated the parent POM file to inherit the latest ASF parent
> (version 14) POM file, which is a pre-requisite for the next step. Once I
> have set things up for the ASF Nexus, we can start pushing -SNAPSHOT build
> artifacts there.
>
> Andrew.
>
> --
> -- andrew kennedy ? engineer : http://cloudsoftcorp.com/developers/ ;
>
>
> On 26 June 2014 19:38, Andrew Kennedy <andrew.kennedy@cloudsoftcorp.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I actually already have access, from Qpid, so I'll set something up and
>> report back.
>>
>> Andrew.
>> --
>> -- andrew kennedy ? cloudsoft & software engineer : @grkvlt ;
>> On 26 Jun 2014 17:22, "Richard Downer" <richard@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> So it seems like a good place to start would be builds.a.o. According
>>> to the Jenkins page on the Apache wiki:
>>> https://wiki.apache.org/general/Jenkins
>>> ...someone who is a PMC chair can grant Jenkins access to committers.
>>> Do we have any PMC chairs amongst our mentors who could grant this to
>>> the Brooklyn committers, or should I take this to incubator-general?
>>>
>>> On 24 June 2014 03:23, David Nalley <david@gnsa.us> wrote:
>>> > So it depends on who you advertise to? If you note that they are
>>> > snapshots, not releases, may eat babies, don't promote that as the way
>>> > to consume Brooklyn, you're probably ok. To the 'general user' of your
>>> > product, you would promote releases that have been voted on by the
>>> > PMC.
>>>
>>> This point is noted, and I also saw the mammoth thread on
>>> legal-general along those lines recently. To avoid controversy we
>>> wouldn't link to snapshot builds on the main parts of the website.
>>> Maybe going off-topic slightly but I think that a "developers" corner
>>> of the website may be called for, where working with bleeding-edge
>>> code, and the breakages that come with it, is expected.
>>>
>>> Richard.
>>>
>>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message