bookkeeper-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: HTTP / REST API?
Date Wed, 08 Nov 2017 16:11:46 GMT
2017-11-08 16:24 GMT+01:00 Ivan Kelly <ivank@apache.org>:

> >> Writing is difficult, because the java client writer is really the core
> of
> >> BookKeeper, it deals with fencing, ensemble changes....
> >> It would be simple to write a client which pushes data to bookies but
> all
> >> the LAC+fencing protocols (+ metadata management) are hard to
> re-implement.
> The http client would have a record of LAC, since any entry acked by
> the http endpoint, would also by definition have to be acked by the
> bookies.
>
> > I don't think we need to reimplement all this details in http api. what
> > people probably need here, is streaming the entries to a ledger, all the
> > fencing are delegated to http endpoint.
> This means that the user should stick to the http endpoint for all
> adds on a single ledger, due single writer constraints. This is
> sensible, but it does mean a layer of coordination between endpoints
> to know where which ledger handles are opened.
>

Or simply we should support a WebSocket endpoint for writers, once the
websocket connection is closed the ledger gets closed and maybe for
"tailing" readers


>
> I think though, that it would make more sense to have the DL api
> behind an http, rather than the raw ledger API. In general I think we
> should be discouraging the use of the raw ledger handle apis, in
> favour of DL. In fact DL already has a stateless frontend with a
> thrift interface for writing, which is probably better than HTTP for
> this kind of workload anyhow.
>
> -Ivan
>

Mime
View raw message