Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-zookeeper-bookkeeper-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-zookeeper-bookkeeper-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 41343915E for ; Tue, 21 May 2013 20:11:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 42388 invoked by uid 500); 21 May 2013 20:11:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-zookeeper-bookkeeper-user-archive@zookeeper.apache.org Received: (qmail 42359 invoked by uid 500); 21 May 2013 20:11:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact bookkeeper-user-help@zookeeper.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: bookkeeper-user@zookeeper.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list bookkeeper-user@zookeeper.apache.org Received: (qmail 42351 invoked by uid 99); 21 May 2013 20:11:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 May 2013 20:11:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.2 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [77.238.189.90] (HELO nm10-vm0.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com) (77.238.189.90) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 21 May 2013 20:11:13 +0000 Received: from [77.238.189.234] by nm10.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 21 May 2013 20:10:48 -0000 Received: from [46.228.39.81] by tm15.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 21 May 2013 20:10:48 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp118.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 21 May 2013 20:10:48 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1369167047; bh=FjqB3ItIkO/9CBh9vn+x8gPNOib4NWkU8Teg5hzFRcI=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-Rocket-Received:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Mailer:Thread-Index:Content-Language; b=gnjKQKYQDfSpP3dR6rNYRUS7Kshpr4kJuym0obNA8qCNJBZUp/4jrBatYSBHxwlaxzr2HIV/Vi8Dah8MpT8CJhpliJJgbqD1SZynT/1+cBqlD4oPOcIGMSgydX3pwiicFLzQTMazWU2JR7hUjQHieAT9/QgnMo2N9m9F45i84wc= X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 997098.46010.bm@smtp118.mail.ir2.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: ilpjxjUVM1nKnytX7LbbcBlzGN5lDCjJA0LgvT__oxVAZVQ Aq2d4wk7YjAZbK3ZKcLBGUdz4h5nnc6Q.3RwlcAgkxsBk7QzHRdpqXj20m23 4wwys94YCQ0qrAYUL5pMPC0j2Ku7hzE.ux0ORPEUnZFA7WoRsyty5MI8dYUY R.tR6YBLYaw5zi6SEZ8oOv5RfrkjvE0oykc8BQXGb3zllH7_BkR_SLpYlx23 oCvNjzey0vhmNu1YEC13U21ndQrSh.hZo4cayMjkYFx6h4OCJ_aSMdUKK0N8 d.3Rq0jlrzvZ2YoprpSaZfXTaqhgOvKnlzOjUaVKkhVKky2RhxiFn_A_GQvN T9PbgreGYm.oSe8CZnmro7uH9z1tOWwxc5rO7op_2ba3qVmLMO39uwyEs0tB rDj.9k2oRyTF_DZD5ZnJXoh_mZOXs6sQYRK6gd9gqE8yApyZhvHIxPwdfr_5 AW.KDzQ-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: HT5UJDeswBACWJPOeualxAa.da..S.fl X-Rocket-Received: from MSRC4018287 (fpjunqueira@95.148.245.225 with ) by smtp118.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 21 May 2013 20:10:47 +0000 UTC From: "Flavio Junqueira" To: References: In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: Current version plans Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 21:10:45 +0100 Message-ID: <006601ce565f$47f9fb10$d7edf130$@yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0067_01CE5667.A9BF2660" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0 Thread-Index: AQIhfVMKruXGaKyftZeULGAtb7Ofj5hpwycw Content-Language: en-gb X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org This is a multipart message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0067_01CE5667.A9BF2660 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I would say that it is ok to test with trunk, since there is no major = issue pending. But, I don=B4t recommend using it in production yet because it = is not stable with all changes in flight.=20 =20 As for the 4.3.0 release, I have been thinking about it too, and it is probably time for us to start thinking about a push to have it out the = door. I=B4ll send a separate message for us to discuss this on the dev list. =20 -Flavio =20 From: Whitney Sorenson [mailto:wsorenson@hubspot.com]=20 Sent: 21 May 2013 20:51 To: bookkeeper-user@zookeeper.apache.org Subject: Current version plans =20 Is it advisable to use trunk?=20 =20 I'd like to take advantage of some fixes that are targeted for 4.3 but I have no idea when to expect any new release. =20 -Whitney ------=_NextPart_000_0067_01CE5667.A9BF2660 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I would say that it is ok to test with = trunk, since there is no major issue pending. But, I don=B4t recommend = using it in production yet because it is not stable with all changes in = flight.

 

As for the 4.3.0 release, I have been = thinking about it too, and it is probably time for us to start thinking = about a push to have it out the door. I=B4ll send a separate message for = us to discuss this on the dev list.

 

-Flavio

 

From: Whitney = Sorenson [mailto:wsorenson@hubspot.com]
Sent: 21 May 2013 = 20:51
To: = bookkeeper-user@zookeeper.apache.org
Subject: Current version = plans

 

Is = it advisable to use trunk? 

 

I'd like to take advantage of some fixes that are = targeted for 4.3 but I have no idea when to expect any new = release.

 

-Whitney

------=_NextPart_000_0067_01CE5667.A9BF2660--