bookkeeper-distributedlog-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Xi Liu <xi.liu....@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [Review] The first release of Apache DistributedLog
Date Fri, 06 Jan 2017 07:27:09 GMT
It would be great to include any performance numbers.

On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 5:51 PM, Sijie Guo <sijie@apache.org> wrote:

> Cool to see you here, Enrico. And thank you for your suggestion.
>
> I will try to write a separate one for DL and BK. Try to keep this one
> focus on a short release post.
>
> - Sijie
>
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 1:43 PM, Enrico Olivelli <eolivelli@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Sijie,
> > I am following this release and the great work DL comunity is doing.
> > Maybe it would be worth to write some paragraph about the difference from
> > BookKeeper and/or the relation with it.
> >
> >
> > Enrico
> >
> > Il gio 5 gen 2017, 19:13 Asko Kauppi <asko.kauppi@zalando.fi> ha
> scritto:
> >
> > > Hi Sijie,
> > >
> > > most readers will likely not know about DistributedLog. A short
> > comparison
> > > - or a link to one - e.g. with Kafka might help set the stage for them.
> > > i.e. why does it exist?
> > >
> > > This is even more important since Uber recently also publicized their
> > > persistent message bus solution. If these start dropping down, there
> > needs
> > > to be more (technical) reason than just another vendor opening their
> > chest.
> > > :)
> > >
> > > Other than that, the structure seemed nice but it can be slightly
> > shorter.
> > >
> > > Just my 2c
> > > - asko
> > >
> > >
> > > On 4 January 2017 at 10:38, Sijie Guo <sijie@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I drafted a blog post for announcing the first apache release. Here
> is
> > > the
> > > > draft. Please help review it :D
> > > >
> > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IXVmP2cHkf4ydeUHUJN9p5ZWTpA1a
> > > > uwBhfqMnYBu4A0/edit
> > > >
> > > > - Sijie
> > > >
> > >
> > --
> >
> >
> > -- Enrico Olivelli
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message