bookkeeper-distributedlog-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gerrit Sundaram <gerritsunda...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSSION] First Release
Date Thu, 17 Nov 2016 09:40:27 GMT
+1

On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 7:02 PM, Leigh Stewart <lstewart@twitter.com.invalid
> wrote:

> +1
>
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 7:01 PM, Franck Cuny <franck.cuny@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 and I agree to not make DL-2 a blocker.
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 2:02 AM, Xi Liu <xi.liu.ant@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 especially on DL-23.
> > >
> > > - Xi
> > >
> > > On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 2:22 AM, Khurrum Nasim <
> khurrumnasimm@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > >
> > > > I am also interested in participating.
> > > >
> > > > - kn
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 11:08 PM, Sijie Guo <sijie@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I'd like to start the discussion about the first release. There are
> > > > still a
> > > > > few discussions and pull requests outstanding. I think we need to
> > pick
> > > > up a
> > > > > few items and cut the first release and then iterate from there.
> Here
> > > is
> > > > a
> > > > > list of items that I think we should include:
> > > > >
> > > > > - DL-4 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-4>: Repackaging
> > > > namespace
> > > > > to org.apache (the pull request is out and under reviewing)
> > > > > - DL-49 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-49>: support
> scala
> > > > 2.10
> > > > > and 2.11 (the review is done, need to be merged)
> > > > > - DL-23 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-23>: Move
DL to
> > > depend
> > > > > on
> > > > > central maven repo. The main blocker is about the libthrift
> version,
> > > > which
> > > > > is only hosted at twtter's maven repo. There is a pull request out.
> > > > >
> > > > > I am kind of thinking to not make DL-2
> > > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-2> (using the official
> > > > > bookkeeper
> > > > > version) the blocker for the first release. We can cut a new
> release
> > > once
> > > > > that change is ready. So to decouple the release procedure between
> DL
> > > and
> > > > > BK.
> > > > >
> > > > > Please feel free to add any jiras that you believe it should be
> > > included
> > > > in
> > > > > the first release.
> > > > >
> > > > > Also, is there anyone interested in being the release manager for
> > first
> > > > > release?
> > > > >
> > > > > - Sijie
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > -franck
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message