bloodhound-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Olemis Lang <ole...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: The meaning of ticket relations
Date Mon, 05 Aug 2013 15:31:12 GMT
On 8/5/13, Matevž Bradač <matevz@digiverse.si> wrote:
>
> On 4. Aug, 2013, at 22:33, Olemis Lang wrote:
>
>> With my user hat on this time ...
>>
>>  - Edit ticket t1 .
>>  - Manage relationships
>>  - Set
>>    * Related ticket = t2
>>    * Relation type = parent
>>    * Comment = <whatever>
>>
>> Q :
>>
>>  - What's the parent ticket and what's the child ?
>
> We should fix the semantics for relations before 1.0, it's really
> confusing in the current form.

yes

> In your case (IIRC) parent would be
> t1 and child t2.
>

I get it now ...

> Perhaps having a JIRA-like approach for managing relations would be better:
>   "This ticket <verb> <target ticket>"
> where <verb> is one of
>   * duplicates
>   * is duplicated by
>   * is a parent of
>   * is a child of
>   * refers to
>   ...
> IMO the above looks much less ambiguous.
>

fwiw +

[...]
>
> HTH,

Yes, thanks .

-- 
Regards,

Olemis - @olemislc

Mime
View raw message