Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-bloodhound-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-bloodhound-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 50652F79C for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 21:29:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 11040 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2013 21:29:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-bloodhound-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 11016 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2013 21:29:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact bloodhound-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 11003 invoked by uid 99); 25 Mar 2013 21:29:09 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 21:29:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of olemis@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.169] (HELO mail-ie0-f169.google.com) (209.85.223.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 21:29:04 +0000 Received: by mail-ie0-f169.google.com with SMTP id qd14so6590844ieb.14 for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 14:28:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=se27dNXYAWTHc5A4lnx0V1LqLB1LcCvB4oHXfD/cFwg=; b=AwlyB91ls1/N39CvBD3iWyL2Nvwc1v8Q5k6FFeerlzw1UVXQ93I0z8RE9ko4DmuMBX IJ0v4VM5DIivXcygjFBzKP9th8MjKLt/bLYeAfCyvmVeVO+KqKw7pxQ/AqFcblzJYm5i Rf5wEQAu1y1QZl9mAHQ01NWq5PEjbECa4oPnWgpvBCRI4M0tp1wQABkNFHhXhBWpc5cP 4Wb7Qfl0LX6vr8s8DgG7Rv3E+ylKOObYQRehI6P2/r4DgVaQm84MF4TegQNn4OS94ne8 R9criyZeyBDKvBf1AHvxsS8OoQWQNql34GLgBTNX8h1qMtJ719Qv0VAHE249cqmt9z7p jjaQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.154.133 with SMTP id vo5mr8719773igb.77.1364246923527; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 14:28:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.50.125.6 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 14:28:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <514DB9DA.5010303@wandisco.com> <515045A7.8000601@wandisco.com> Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 16:28:43 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Bug in ticket workflow? From: Olemis Lang To: bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 3/25/13, Matev=C5=BE Brada=C4=8D wrote: > [...] > On another note, Trac seems to allow assigning tickets to non-existant > users, > without any warning. Should we at least warn the users of a potential > mistake, > or perhaps even prevent it (though this might be a bit extreme)? > Beyond component owner , there is also default owner and restrict owner config options . The later will display a drop down box . If that is enough then this may be solved in TracIni configuration . --=20 Regards, Olemis.