Mailing-List: contact bloodhound-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of olemis@gmail.com designates
 209.85.223.174 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <512CD51C.4040402@kraav.com>
References: 
 <CAGMZAuPNHLxJDFdKKrEBjP6nSuhaoFqWUGv_nUjzvFcS-zVBDA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPt9QwQ=V0zSZr0sq8pJ51uhdK9Bvq+k-Au59VGoCYFYmWBR4w@mail.gmail.com>
	<512CD51C.4040402@kraav.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 02:42:25 -0500
Message-ID: 
 <CAGMZAuPeHWEEG0KCTXTDknL1dESTMFijC45osPAah1UDyj5_Gw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Request for vendor branch upgrade WAS: [Trac-dev] 1.0.1/1.1.1:
 more work than expected... but getting there
From: Olemis Lang <olemis@gmail.com>
To: bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On 2/26/13, Leho Kraav <leho@kraav.com> wrote:
> On 02.02.2013 01:10, Ryan Ollos wrote:
>>   3. There is nothing in 1.1.1 that we really need yet as far as I can
>> see:
>> http://trac.edgewall.org/query?group=status&milestone=1.1.1
>>
>> I think we need to re-access the 1.0.x vs 1.1.x issue at every release,
>> but
>> I see no reason to not upgrade to one or the other.
>
> To me, 1.1.1 has the Ticket custom date field implementation.
>

Maybe we shall reconsider integrating 1.1.x in Release 6 , won't be
possible before that date as current feature set should be already
frozen as we approach Release 5 release date .

-- 
Regards,

Olemis.