Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-bloodhound-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-bloodhound-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BAD01E461 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2013 12:13:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 27319 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jan 2013 12:13:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-bloodhound-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 27157 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jan 2013 12:13:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact bloodhound-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 27109 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jan 2013 12:13:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 26 Jan 2013 12:13:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.53] (HELO mail-qa0-f53.google.com) (209.85.216.53) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 26 Jan 2013 12:13:38 +0000 Received: by mail-qa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id z4so196690qan.12 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2013 04:13:16 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=DazIz8kOqzQ9/HJ2L2B4ky9oUlmDLsXKnnyfN8O+3LM=; b=NCX55IYnMvGVucUk1zCAkMVbK+9Q8nMstUPaAiQoCcXsAeNC0UBXV5GY/8EPPV8CAn ANBdXJTuX80MzNh0N5dkhiJlsQU4xMbWyo7ZvV/51hPcMlw2pig/deAMrK1NHyLJNE8y RfTZcBgYH+9zf33URn/y/sBB4lHSJnqSMJ63XQs3RoaXPUS1fxc5hLAlNif7foZBM1oQ EFMIeLRFTfMHL5Q+cbbpSA/n0fWrdLLDrTBSt4Mf8vuaGQkdMxzpl/x8rgGCZxbvDUc5 RUsGo1HcfXGkzemrTDkuxD75cm0jXofKwfRgDRVZqOjmGW94r3w/uuiMuz6iBiDSuqo0 0hmQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.229.179.95 with SMTP id bp31mr2142600qcb.95.1359202396343; Sat, 26 Jan 2013 04:13:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.49.6.73 with HTTP; Sat, 26 Jan 2013 04:13:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <50F91C2A.6010307@wandisco.com> Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 13:13:16 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: User comments on ticket modification UI From: Andrej Golcov To: bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmxX1QpZZ8Az+Q86s8+DWYtYkcyohbNqSg1kv4zy0oaijyEU/Avr86vKadYB+MWEjbUN+lW X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Just want to somehow summarise issues we discussed about and initiate further discussion. - After update, result page scroll is confusing. At the time of being, it is scrolled to the result #comment. I guess, we have consensus that result page should be scrolled to the top? Link to the comment can be shown in popup. - Modify button in navigation bar acts odd. There is suggestion to move it out of nav bar. - "Update (leave)" caption of update button confuses user. There is aslo a suggestion to move workflow actions out of Modify functionality as separate action. We need more feedback and mockups on this. - "Submit changes" button duplicates "Update (leave)" button. - If Change history is long, "Add comment" field may not be visible to user. There is suggestion to collapse Change History in Modify mode. Or may be put Add comment before Change History in read-only and modify modes? Did I forget something? Please add your experience feedback. Regards, Andrej