Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-bloodhound-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-bloodhound-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DEA7DD062 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 16:02:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24667 invoked by uid 500); 19 Nov 2012 16:02:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-bloodhound-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 24593 invoked by uid 500); 19 Nov 2012 16:02:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact bloodhound-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 24582 invoked by uid 99); 19 Nov 2012 16:02:22 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 16:02:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.217.175] (HELO mail-lb0-f175.google.com) (209.85.217.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 16:02:16 +0000 Received: by mail-lb0-f175.google.com with SMTP id gg13so1056462lbb.6 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 08:01:54 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=M0Sc4WdXO6qagK+gFVvr9aIXRbKkUHOaHC2hgheaGEw=; b=irtdSP66Zx+svgeLnL+VFB2mIbfQxJEzAmFoGn3RZH4UTNyQ//9VUaptozNI/zp/vS P1OjAkiCLv1y67jDNomKlXqOFHEpJgjW3lyw1DVM4SJQdANLi+1f0dyQBeNJitQbJle2 QBoEo4QqNpUkSt4KUWDDXW4iKcdjjGsSf7A4o2qcWJaD/R9k801oR0O+Rht8nl6bPVR2 FAzIHP+6UE9QTRNqw8StWENkPeEDGeONv4VGcxTMiVwSevi4IaUOijGcHXJv2bRFAuV/ l9pI6myKKh+rYlrLTUood7jo6vME4reVBVLMl6CXnCFT+cIet1NrEoGFV+JkuGqdxa6a kaLw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.110.234 with SMTP id id10mr12036639lab.15.1353340914336; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 08:01:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.134.8 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 08:01:54 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [188.196.38.113] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 17:01:54 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Whitelabeling: Messages From: =?UTF-8?Q?Peter_Ko=C5=BEelj?= To: bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0408394d75831004cedb3cba X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlenwZl27ybUhW+KhcsDd97GU2o85WVBf9sdqOVQxxfOzH5us1+atXUVYvpmOJvvQV0kw9u X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --f46d0408394d75831004cedb3cba Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 13 November 2012 16:05, Peter Ko=C5=BEelj wrote: > There is a lot of use of the word "Trac" inside various error messages, > descriptions and user instructions that are shown to the user either > through web UI or responses in CLI tools. All cases are in the Trac itsel= f. > > There are two groups of messages: > > *** Messages hardcoded in python source *** > > There are over 200 instances of word Trac in python strings. Large portio= n > is in docstrings which we can leve as they are. > A few tens of them are actually strings intended for the uses in > printouts, error messages, option descriptions and the like. > > Fixing this would be beneficial but is not of a high priority and would > complicate merging of newer Trac versions quite a bit and at the same tim= e > this is not something we could push back to Trac project. I'll create a l= ow > priority ticket for this so that we have it on radar unless there are som= e > objections to fixing them at all. > https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/262 > > *** Messages in localization files *** > > There are 70+ localized messages and over 30 localized languages. > > Again, this is not fixable without changing the Trac project. In addition > to problems with merging (although smaller that with hardcoded messages) = we > would also have to maintain language translations for all supported > languages. I'll open a low priority ticket for this as well if there are = no > objections. > https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/263 > > *** TracError title *** > > This is actually just on of the cases of a message from localization > files. Proper solution is not any less messy as for any other message > (hacked localization files for all languages). The question is do we wan= t > to fix it even if we choose not to fix all other localizable messages due > to higher frequency of use? > > https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/264 --f46d0408394d75831004cedb3cba--