Mailing-List: contact bloodhound-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of olemis@gmail.com designates
 209.85.212.47 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5088BEA2.6000807@wandisco.com>
References: 
 <CAKE9Bs-8vonCB7idTJGLAYd=1MmBYxQwRVcYkeW3KSLWg7-dZA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGMZAuMi5fGm9FVyYLFRJ9BnZdwFwb+uo-H8jfeK_Tkz-LCLXw@mail.gmail.com>
	<5088BEA2.6000807@wandisco.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 03:02:04 -0500
Message-ID: 
 <CAGMZAuOP=eXbfPjJPGpEcx=U_VTvU5x99iz7-RKmvrcMt8u1hg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Datamodel and data consistency
From: Olemis Lang <olemis@gmail.com>
To: bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 10/24/12, Branko =C4=8Cibej <brane@wandisco.com> wrote:
> On 25.10.2012 04:52, Olemis Lang wrote:
>> On 10/24/12, Peter Ko=C5=BEelj <peter@digiverse.si> wrote:
>>>
[...]
>> This is what Trac-dev should be working towards regarding relations of
>> any kind between resources .
>>
>> http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/TracDev/Proposals/TracRelations
>
> That page was last updated 4 years ago. Are you seriously suggesting
> that referring this question to trac-dev@ will, after all this time,
> have any measurable effect?
>

yes , there are recent conversations where it was cited , especially
regarding post-Trac 1.0 schedule . Indeed multi-project proposal [1]_
is another example , last updated 3 y ago , and there's some recent
work on that direction [2]_ . It's worth to mention that target t-h.o
plugin seems to be intended to be incorporated into Trac at a given
time in the future . The spec is also the starting point (and
inspiration) for our own initial approach towards multi-product
support .

Child was born years ago but still having the same DNA
;)

> There comes a point when you'll have to face the fact that Trac hasn't
> exactly been a hotbed of innovation and new developments recently.
> Which, I understand, happens to be one of the reasons for the existence
> of Bloodhound in the first place.
>

I guess that's the reason in first place , but maybe add to the list
=C2=ABTrac-dev not joining the ASF=C2=BB ...

.. [1] Multiple Projects within a Single Trac Environment
        (http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/TracMultipleProjects/SingleEnvironme=
nt)

.. [2] SimpleMultiProjectPlugin - Recent changes
        (http://trac-hacks.org/wiki/SimpleMultiProjectPlugin#RecentChanges)

--=20
Regards,

Olemis.

Blog ES: http://simelo-es.blogspot.com/
Blog EN: http://simelo-en.blogspot.com/

Featured article: