Mailing-List: contact bloodhound-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of brane@wandisco.com designates
 74.125.82.43 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <5087FBE1.8080606@wandisco.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 15:32:01 +0100
From: =?UTF-8?B?QnJhbmtvIMSMaWJlag==?= <brane@wandisco.com>
Organization: WANdisco
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7;
 rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.2 (incubating)
References: <50729a9a.4254420a.6ecf.1c1dSMTPIN_ADDED@mx.google.com>
 <0743B44B-C0CA-49B9-9A06-CC4286B72DB0@wandisco.com>
 <5087D093.6040104@wandisco.com> <5087FAC0.3030709@wandisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <5087FAC0.3030709@wandisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 24.10.2012 15:27, Gary Martin wrote:
>> P.S.: I'm a bit confused about the status of our trac tree. We make it
>> part of the (signed) source release, but do we have a code grant for it?
>> If we do, why isn't our copy licensed under ALv2? If we don't, how come
>> we're including it in the release tarball?
>
>
> Actually I have no idea about whether there is a code grant but, as
> far as I am aware, that would only change the license, not our ability
> to distribute.

Yes, I'm confused about this distinction myself, which is why I'm
raising the question and hoping someone competent sees it and answers it. :)

-- Brane

-- 
Certified & Supported Apache Subversion Downloads:
http://www.wandisco.com/subversion/download