bloodhound-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Branko Čibej <>
Subject Re: Where do we discuss open tickets?
Date Wed, 19 Sep 2012 11:26:34 GMT
On 19.09.2012 11:20, Gary Martin wrote:
> On 09/19/2012 09:41 AM, Peter Koželj wrote:
>> Hi guys.
>> Another newbie question. Where should various open tickets be discussed?
>> Ticket comments seems natural but that goes to the commits mailing
>> list and
>> if I understood correctly, such discussions should land in the dev list,
>> no?
>> Peter
> Open tickets should really be discussed on the dev list. If you reply
> to the ticket message that goes to the commit list then it naturally
> goes to the dev list. I think that should be encouraged so that we can
> get more decisions made here. On tickets we can provide a link to the
> email discussion and maybe provide a summary of the discussion on the
> ticket once there is a consensus.
> I think we should make sure we list actual work on the ticket itself -
> specifying all the code changes with revision numbers.
> From the point of view of those who cannot commit to the bloodhound
> svn repository, at the moment you would have a choice of either adding
> patches as attachments to the ticket or sending them directly to the
> dev list. When attaching directly to a ticket it would also be best to
> follow this up with an email to the dev list.
> Does this sound reasonable?

This sounds just right. With my mentor hat on, I suggest you document
this process somewhere in the Wiki, along with coding style
requirements, commit log format, etc.

-- Brane

Certified & Supported Apache Subversion Downloads:

View raw message