bloodhound-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gary Martin <>
Subject Change to NOTICE file? (Was Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0 (incubating) (RC1))
Date Tue, 28 Aug 2012 13:01:38 GMT
On 08/03/2012 09:26 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Aug 3, 2012 4:15 AM, "Olemis Lang" <> wrote:
>> ...
>>>> NOTICE , LICENSE and other files will only need to
>>>> mention that file (<= I'm hoping we can do that).
>>> There is no need for these files to refer to a proposed TRAC_VERSION
>>> file. It is sufficient to state "portions developed by..." (as they do
>>> now).
>> I said so in order to say something like this in e.g. NOTICE file .
>> "A modified copy of Trac is included in this source release package.
>> Exact version of Trac may be found in TRAC_VERSION file" ... etc , etc
> Ooooh... I like that! +1
> Cheers,
> -g

Given that this was liked...

At the moment the NOTICE file states:

    Trac - licensed under the BSD License
    This product include software (Trac) developed by
    Edgewall Software (

Are we happy with fixing the typo in the above and appending the 
following to the trac section of the NOTICE file:

    A modified copy of Trac is included in this source
    release package. The exact version of Trac may be
    found in the trac/TRAC_VERSION file.

It might also be nice for the bootstrap part of the NOTICE file to be 
consistent with the rest - I think it should read:

    Bootstrap - licensed under the APLv2 License
    This product includes software (bootstrap) developed by
    Twitter (

to specify the license we understand it to use more carefully.


  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message