Mailing-List: contact bloodhound-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of gary.martin@wandisco.com
 designates 209.85.214.47 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <4F72ED22.7020608@wandisco.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 11:51:14 +0100
From: Gary <gary.martin@wandisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:11.0) Gecko/20120310 Thunderbird/11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Milestone changes on the project issue tracker.
References: <4F71EEC1.6000305@wandisco.com>
 <CABD8fLW-pVQL2WmiSVTdQj+gvSCz02gOrt8d6+eSJbnMqODDvg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CABD8fLW-pVQL2WmiSVTdQj+gvSCz02gOrt8d6+eSJbnMqODDvg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 03/27/2012 06:38 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 12:45, Gary<gary.martin@wandisco.com>  wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have changed the milestones in https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound to get
>> away from the defaults that Bloodhound provides. Instead of the milestoneN
>> set we now have:
>>
>>   * "RC1 for initial release" which is self explanatory but it may be of
>> interest that it specifies a tentative due date of Apr 27th.
>>   * "Unscheduled" which is intended for work that should be done but has not
>> been assigned to a milestone
>>
>> I am also considering creating a triage milestone to go with those.
> I would think of "Untriaged" as a status (eg. all new issues). Once
> the issue has been triaged, then it goes into a specific milestone.

Do you mean that you want the set of statuses (and so the workflow) 
adjusted? I think that just creating a "Triage" milestone that is the 
default milestone option for a new ticket will be simpler.

For reference, the ticket workflow we are using at the moment is shown 
graphically here: 
https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/wiki/TracWorkflow#Environmentscreatedwith0.11

Cheers,
     Gary