bigtop-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From 김영우 (Youngwoo Kim) <warwit...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: hive 2.x support
Date Thu, 07 Apr 2016 14:33:09 GMT
Internally, I evaluated Hive 2.x with the rest of current Bigtop stack. we
should consider bumping up Tez and HBase to appropriate versions along with
Hive 2.x. It works fine so far but tests are going on...

- Youngwoo

On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 8:09 AM, <nate@reactor8.com> wrote:

> Nice, didn’t see BIGTOP-2349.  We had client mention hive2 so will direct
> our guys to look into BIGTOP-2349 and any other related pop up if they want
> to move forward on it
>
> Sounded like from language in news announcement that any future Hadoop2
> items would go into hive2, leaving hive 1.x for only maintenance around
> hadoop1 patching.  Seems we might not be too far off where we have similar
> issue similar to spark 1.x vs spark 2 support and different users wanting
> latest stable, while others need/want to be on previous stable
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Olaf Flebbe [mailto:of@oflebbe.de]
> Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2016 1:37 PM
> To: user@bigtop.apache.org
> Subject: Re: hive 2.x support
>
> Hive 1.x supported Hadoop 2 as well.
>
> We already have a first ticket for Hive 2 :
>  BIGTOP-2349
>
> And yes, we should move to hive 2, sooner or later.
>
> Olaf
>
>
> > Am 27.03.2016 um 20:31 schrieb nate@reactor8.com:
> >
> > Was catching up on news from other projects, noticed this from Hive 2.0
> release:
> >
> > -------------------
> > 15 February 2016 : release 2.0.0 available¶ This release works with
> > Hadoop 2.x.y. Hive 1.x line will continue to be maintained with Hadoop
> 1.x.y support. You can look at the complete JIRA change log for this
> release.
> >
> > -------------------------------
> >
> > Assuming this means that Hadoop 2 users should move to Hive 2.x sooner
> than later.  Whats groups thought on moving bigtop version of hive to 2.x?
> >
>
>
>

Mime
View raw message