bigtop-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From RJ Nowling <rnowl...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Gearing up for 0.9
Date Thu, 12 Mar 2015 13:04:19 GMT
Hi David,

What parts of Mahout do you need for your thesis?  I'm familiar with
Spark's MLLlib and maybe I can point out the equivalent parts.

RJ

On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 12:57 AM, David Starina <david.starina@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi guys,
>
> I'm just an observer, a passer-by you might say (for now) of this mailing
> list, so I hope you won't mind me commenting on this. I was planning to use
> Hadoop with Mahout in my thesis, so this thread kind of freaked me out.
> Since you are mentioning the two pieces of software are incompatible - does
> that mean it is not possible to get them to work together, or just that it
> requires some extra effort? Also, there are some algorithms that work with
> Spark - do you know whether those still work with recent versions of Spark?
> Is there a lot of work to manually install Mahout without Bigtop?
>
> Anyhow, hope the Mahout guys find their focus again.
>
> Best regards,
> David
>
>
> On Thursday, March 12, 2015, jay vyas <jayunit100.apache@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> okay, lets drop it... Im fine with that.
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 7:49 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <cos@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> But the last time, back in 0.8, we found that runtime is pretty broken.
>>> So, is
>>> there any real reason to keep on pushing an incompatible piece of
>>> software?
>>>
>>> Cos
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 09:42AM, jay vyas wrote:
>>> >    At this point we can just keep packaging as is, but if bugs crop
>>> up, drop
>>> >    it unless we can get help
>>> >    On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 11:49 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <cos@apache.org
>>> >
>>> >    wrote:
>>> >
>>> >      Should read
>>> >
>>> >      So, anyone is interested to maintain Mahout OR a thing of similar
>>> >      nature?
>>> >
>>> >      Sorry
>>> >      On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 08:45PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>>> >      > So, anyone is interested to maintain Mahout and a thing of
>>> similar
>>> >      nature?
>>> >
>>> >      >
>>> >      > Cos
>>> >      >
>>> >      > On Sat, Mar 07, 2015 at 02:13AM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>>> >      > > I think it eventually boils down to who will be maintaining
>>> the
>>> >      component.
>>> >      > >
>>> >      > > As Jay said - there's maintainer for the component and if
it
>>> will
>>> >      continue
>>> >      > > like this we might have no choice but delete it: I think
>>> right now
>>> >      it blocks
>>> >      > > the release.
>>> >      > >
>>> >      > > Cos
>>> >      > >
>>> >      > > On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 02:29PM, Ed - 0x1b wrote:
>>> >      > > > some links to some of Mahout's replacements - not all
Apache
>>> >      projects.
>>> >      > > >
>>> >      > > >
>>> >
>>> https://gigaom.com/2014/03/27/apache-mahout-hadoops-original-machine-learning-project-is-moving-on-from-mapreduce/
>>> >      > > > http://0xdata.com/
>>> >      > > > https://spark.apache.org/mllib/
>>> >      > > >
>>> >
>>> https://databricks.com/blog/2014/06/30/sparkling-water-h20-spark.html
>>> >      > > > https://github.com/apache/mahout/tree/master/h2o
>>> >      > > >
>>> >      > > > and
>>> >      > > >
>>> >      > > >
>>> >
>>> https://gigaom.com/2014/02/28/cloudera-is-rebuilding-machine-learning-for-hadoop-with-oryx/
>>> >      > > >
>>> >      > > > On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 12:47 PM, Konstantin Boudnik
>>> >      <cos@apache.org> wrote:
>>> >      > > > > Thanks man! I've heard that there's a new project
that
>>> picks up
>>> >      where Mahout
>>> >      > > > > left of wrt Hadoop2.x support. But might be I am
just
>>> delusional
>>> >      from
>>> >      > > > > hunger...?
>>> >      > > > >
>>> >      > > > > On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 02:32PM, jay vyas wrote:
>>> >      > > > >>A  A  i sent a email to mahout-dev... maybe
someone will
>>> ping
>>> >      back :)
>>> >      > > > >>A  A  On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Jay Vyas
>>> >      <jayunit100.apache@gmail.com>
>>> >      > > > >>A  A  wrote:
>>> >      > > > >>
>>> >      > > > >>A  A  A  Iirc we don't have any maintainers
for it.
>>> >      > > > >>A  A  A  Is anyone interested in maintaining
it?
>>> >      > > > >>A  A  A  > On Mar 6, 2015, at 2:23 PM, Konstantin
Boudnik
>>> >      <cos@apache.org> wrote:
>>> >      > > > >>A  A  A  >
>>> >      > > > >>A  A  A  > Does anyone know what's the story
with Mahout?
>>> Has it
>>> >      been fixed to be
>>> >      > > > >>A  A  A  working
>>> >      > > > >>A  A  A  > with Hadoop2 or shall we remove
it from the
>>> BOM?
>>> >      > > > >>A  A  A  >
>>> >      > > > >>A  A  A  > Cos
>>> >      > > > >>A  A  A  >
>>> >      > > > >>A  A  A  >> On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 06:56PM,
Konstantin
>>> Boudnik
>>> >      wrote:
>>> >      > > > >>A  A  A  >> Guys,
>>> >      > > > >>A  A  A  >>
>>> >      > > > >>A  A  A  >> It'd be great if we can have
the next release
>>> ready
>>> >      by ApacheCon in
>>> >      > > > >>A  A  A  April.
>>> >      > > > >>A  A  A  >> Think about all the PR and
publicity we can
>>> get
>>> >      without any effort on
>>> >      > > > >>A  A  A  our own.
>>> >      > > > >>A  A  A  >> And perhaps from the tactical
standpoint we
>>> shall
>>> >      call this release
>>> >      > > > >>A  A  A  1.0?
>>> >      > > > >>A  A  A  >>
>>> >      > > > >>A  A  A  >> I believe the only major hurdle
between us
>>> and the
>>> >      release is CI.
>>> >      > > > >>A  A  A  Roman, I
>>> >      > > > >>A  A  A  >> understand you're busy elsewhere,
but could
>>> you
>>> >      please let us know
>>> >      > > > >>A  A  A  what else
>>> >      > > > >>A  A  A  >> needs to be done before we
can start doing the
>>> >      regular builds and how
>>> >      > > > >>A  A  A  the
>>> >      > > > >>A  A  A  >> community can help. That's
the highest
>>> priority,
>>> >      IMO.
>>> >      > > > >>A  A  A  >>
>>> >      > > > >>A  A  A  >> There a couple of the tickets
left
>>> >      unfixed/unassigned on BIGTOP-1480,
>>> >      > > > >>A  A  A  and if
>>> >      > > > >>A  A  A  >> they aren't resolved on time
we can move them
>>> >      farther. There's lesser
>>> >      > > > >>A  A  A  than a
>>> >      > > > >>A  A  A  >> half-dozen blockers and none
of them look too
>>> big,
>>> >      honestly. And we
>>> >      > > > >>A  A  A  have a
>>> >      > > > >>A  A  A  >> whole lot of active committers
and
>>> contributors to
>>> >      wrap-up the
>>> >      > > > >>A  A  A  release in a
>>> >      > > > >>A  A  A  >> couple of weeks.
>>> >      > > > >>A  A  A  >>
>>> >      > > > >>A  A  A  >> Do we want to try upgrade
to HBase 1.x for
>>> this
>>> >      release or it might
>>> >      > > > >>A  A  A  be too big
>>> >      > > > >>A  A  A  >> of a distortion? Andrew, what
do you think
>>> and do
>>> >      you have cycles to
>>> >      > > > >>A  A  A  do that?
>>> >      > > > >>A  A  A  >>
>>> >      > > > >>A  A  A  >> What else we need to get done
for this
>>> release?
>>> >      Suggestions?
>>> >      > > > >>A  A  A  >>
>>> >      > > > >>A  A  A  >> Is there anyone who wants
to step up as the
>>> RM this
>>> >      time around? RM
>>> >      > > > >>A  A  A  doesn't
>>> >      > > > >>A  A  A  >> mean that you have to do all
the job, but
>>> rather be
>>> >      an efficient with
>>> >      > > > >>A  A  A  a stick ;)
>>> >      > > > >>A  A  A  >>
>>> >      > > > >>A  A  A  >> Thoughts?
>>> >      > > > >>A  A  A  >>AA  Cos
>>> >      > > > >>
>>> >      > > > >>A  A  --
>>> >      > > > >>A  A  jay vyas
>>> >
>>> >    --
>>> >    jay vyas
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> jay vyas
>>
>

Mime
View raw message