bigtop-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Konstantin Boudnik <...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Gearing up for 0.9
Date Wed, 18 Mar 2015 22:50:28 GMT
Fellas,

I have just created 1.1.0 release to accommodate the stuff from 1.0; and moved
all issues from 0.9 to 1.0. BIGTOP-1480 has been re-purposed to reflect that
the next release is 1.0

Release 0.9 has been archived to avoid any confusion.

Please let me know if you see any issues.

Thanks!
  Cos

On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 06:14AM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> Any objections to this, anyone? Let's wait a couple of days and if no speaks
> up against it - let's repurpose BIGTOP-1480 to reflect this decision.
> 
> Cos
> 
> On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 10:27PM, jay vyas wrote:
> >    after thinking more, in IRC, this is a great idea !
> > 
> >    - lets ditch 0.9 , and
> >    - release 1x as a new, next generation bigtop which features a broad
> >    spectrum of in memory analytics tooling
> >    On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 11:07 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <cos@apache.org>
> >    wrote:
> > 
> >      On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 12:14PM, Peter Linnell wrote:
> >      > Hi Cos,
> >      >
> >      > On Sat, 28 Feb 2015 18:56:19 +0000
> >      > Konstantin Boudnik <cos@apache.org> wrote:
> >      >
> >      > > Guys,
> >      > >
> >      > > It'd be great if we can have the next release ready by ApacheCon
in
> >      > > April. Think about all the PR and publicity we can get without any
> >      > > effort on our own. And perhaps from the tactical standpoint we shall
> >      > > call this release 1.0?
> >      > >
> >      >
> >      > Definitely something to consider.
> >      >
> >      > > I believe the only major hurdle between us and the release is CI.
> >      > > Roman, I understand you're busy elsewhere, but could you please let
> >      > > us know what else needs to be done before we can start doing the
> >      > > regular builds and how the community can help. That's the highest
> >      > > priority, IMO.
> >      > >
> >      > > There a couple of the tickets left unfixed/unassigned on
> >      BIGTOP-1480,
> >      > > and if they aren't resolved on time we can move them farther.
> >      There's
> >      > > lesser than a half-dozen blockers and none of them look too big,
> >      > > honestly. And we have a whole lot of active committers and
> >      > > contributors to wrap-up the release in a couple of weeks.
> >      > >
> >      > > Do we want to try upgrade to HBase 1.x for this release or it might
> >      > > be too big of a distortion? Andrew, what do you think and do you
> >      have
> >      > > cycles to do that?
> >      > >
> >      > > What else we need to get done for this release? Suggestions?
> >      >
> >      > Make sure our website is fully up to date and some wiki pages on build
> >      > details need updating. E.g no need to build protobuf, I've got a repo
> >      > where I built all the needed bits on build.opensuse.org for both rpm
> >      > distros *and* debs.
> > 
> >      I think the two pages you're referring to should be gone - I have added
> >      link
> >      to the modern description of build process (right at the top of the
> >      page).
> >      Also, there's a ticket to improve the wiki in this regards.
> >      > > Is there anyone who wants to step up as the RM this time around?
RM
> >      > > doesn't mean that you have to do all the job, but rather be an
> >      > > efficient with a stick ;)
> >      > >
> >      >
> >      > I'm going to tentative raise my hand for that. I've done it before and
> >      > later March to most of April my travel schedule calms down a lot.A 
> >      I'll
> >      > give a definite in the next few days.
> >      >
> >      > > Thoughts?
> >      > >A  A Cos
> >      >
> >      >
> >      > Cheers,
> >      > Peter
> > 
> >    --
> >    jay vyas

Mime
View raw message