Mailing-List: contact user-help@bigtop.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@bigtop.apache.org
Received-SPF: error (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2014 11:30:02 -0800
From: Konstantin Boudnik <cos@apache.org>
To: user@bigtop.apache.org
Cc: "dev@bigtop.apache.org" <dev@bigtop.apache.org>
Subject: Re: To speed up the development: shall we become a CTR project?
Message-ID: <20141227193002.GD5011@tpx>
Mail-Followup-To: user@bigtop.apache.org,
	"dev@bigtop.apache.org" <dev@bigtop.apache.org>
References: <20141225011642.GC4791@tpx>
 <CA+RK=_CKONrpv14U--0CsDBRyLVLxy7Zmz171qa8tUhn36b-NQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <9109D753-BB40-467A-B805-F22F39D091D6@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GyRA7555PLgSTuth"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <9109D753-BB40-467A-B805-F22F39D091D6@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)


--GyRA7555PLgSTuth
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Branches are irrelevant to how the we allow the commits to get in.

Branches are needed for more complex features that require a collaborate
effort and/or prolonged development time. Does it make sense?

Cos

On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 09:26AM, Jay Vyas wrote:
> If we wanna do CTR ...=20
> Can we just do it into master?
> I realize it will break but that what CI is for.
>=20
> I wanna make sure we aren't just creating a backlog of unmerged branches.
>=20
> > On Dec 26, 2014, at 4:23 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org> wrote:
> >=20
> > +1 from me
> >=20
> >> On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <cos@apache.org> w=
rote:
> >> I've been reading this discussion on Ignite (incubating) dev@ list
> >> http://s.apache.org/wPA and it clicked with the thread we were having =
in
> >> the last few days around the community and development processes.
> >>=20
> >> What do you guys think if we'll try CTR model? Committers here went th=
rough
> >> the process of gaining their karma and proved with their contributions=
 that
> >> they don't need peer-reviews for a lot of things that are coming into =
the
> >> project on the daily basis. The RTC is especially annoying for trivial=
 changes
> >> and is really making things slower than they could've been.
> >>=20
> >> So, what do you think guys?
> >>=20
> >> --
> >> Take care,
> >>         Cos
> >> 2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616  6115 220F 6980 1F27 E622
> >> Cos' pubkey: http://people.apache.org/~cos/cos.asc
> >>=20
> >>          ---- Wisdom of the hour ----
> >>=20
> >> FORTUNE PROVIDES QUESTIONS FOR THE GREAT ANSWERS: #4
> >> A:      Go west, young man, go west!
> >> Q:      What do wabbits do when they get tiwed of wunning awound?
> >=20
> >=20
> >=20
> > --=20
> > Best regards,
> >=20
> >    - Andy
> >=20
> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hei=
n (via Tom White)

--GyRA7555PLgSTuth
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUnwi6AAoJEKtmQW7Qw4JPtooIAK9apEGdcIbiY4/P6PClL3Wf
0ET352qsyJnJMEhBP0yQgQb8q0F8/LTQsyw8yQEt9mfAuqBBQG2stu1gx1L4rbGh
q7jYklrgYzp2n4ySfYE728kAChOOHnuJDYhZ8F9MqiYn615rcMYSUnyMCCQ0MRuw
Z/Yd9bB2NCmSO+MobCXSUJLcfcvGaEIwujBqJ+6Onx2E724Y6/ESvY4IkvokZJpy
1eN5ZrPTCIK9dsulQxDsHQv8XLOT++34j1ruF5pGkhglmmXBWi5czJURC0bwqVSS
kEtfvC0oaB7IARoyVTLk+FwTwXcBLDKzikVhxpiHCBZqUyTIUA7TLxY69VER3Ks=
=Ji5b
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--GyRA7555PLgSTuth--