bigtop-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org>
Subject Re: possible bug in puppet installation?
Date Sat, 29 Nov 2014 23:44:29 GMT
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 5:23 PM, Leidle, Rob <leidle@amazon.com> wrote:
> Thank you for the reply. I would think that is how it would work. However,
> isn¹t that script starting the secondary-namenode service when ha is
> ³disabled²? That¹s the behavior I am seeing. I have no configured for HA
> yet secondary namenode is being configured and started by the puppet
> scripts.

I think you're being confused by the terminology here. Seconadary name
node is a very old piece of HDFS and it has little to do with HA. When HA
was implemented in HDFS a notion of a stand-by namemode was introduced.
With that a need for a secondary namenode disappeared.

Thanks,
Roman.

Mime
View raw message