Mailing-List: contact user-help@bigtop.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@bigtop.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 19:40:37 -0700
From: Konstantin Boudnik <cos@apache.org>
To: user@bigtop.apache.org
Cc: "dev@bigtop.apache.org" <dev@bigtop.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Working on the BOM.next (0.9.0 or 1.0?)
Message-ID: <20141014024037.GC3827@tpx>
Mail-Followup-To: user@bigtop.apache.org,
	"dev@bigtop.apache.org" <dev@bigtop.apache.org>
References: <20141004231018.GL8064@tpx>
 <20141012015839.GA18801@tpx>
 <CA+ULb+sixMWsQrcEYfE-9x2YwSk6qXc9JWa=8Nh8RrT=gfN=Lw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CACVCA=eCp6ov1ML4hQ=F8-OBD7BKjh8-YWVJH7UH1oa7i1W1DQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Qbvjkv9qwOGw/5Fx"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: 
 <CACVCA=eCp6ov1ML4hQ=F8-OBD7BKjh8-YWVJH7UH1oa7i1W1DQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)


--Qbvjkv9qwOGw/5Fx
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 09:19AM, jay vyas wrote:
> thanks roman and cos.
> To summarize, i think we can all agree there are 3 things we can do :
>=20
> - limit components to stuff we enjoy working on, or stuff others will help
> with.
> - reach out to hadoop ecosystem communities to get definitive "yes" or "n=
o"
> on wether they will help maintain packages.
> - focus on automation.  I think everytthing that can be automated, should
> be.  lets never do a manual build or test again.
>=20
> I will create A JIRA to get community feedback from at least one commiter
> on each project bigtop currently supports.

That be great, Jay!

Let's it make it clear that they don't need to support the packaging for th=
eir
components - after all that's what we here are experts in doing. Instead it=
'd
be great for all our users if our upstream components become more active in
incorporating Bigtop as a their official go-nogo release gate. For that we
need to make Bigtop to be much easier for a layman to use, and that's exact=
ly
what we are focusing in 0.9, I guess.

Makes sense?
  Cos

> On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 11:25 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <roman@shaposhnik.org>
> wrote:
>=20
> > On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 6:58 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <cos@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > Looks like it is going slow. so I will continue. To start with...
> > >
> > > I am proposing the following set of supported platforms (similar to l=
ast
> > time)
> > >
> > > OS:
> > >   CentOS6, CentOS7, Fedora 20
> >
> > Should we be really targeting both?
> >
> > >   SLES12, OpenSUSE 13.1
> > >   Ubuntu 14.04 LTS
> > >
> > > Java:
> > >   OpenJDK 7
> > >
> > > Components:
> > >
> > >   Zookeeper 3.4.6 (or later?)
> > >   Hadoop 2.6.x
> > >   HBase 0.98.x (latest; I am not sure if 1.0 will be ready in the 2
> > months?)
> >
> > That's a great question for Andrew.
> >
> > >   Hive 0.14
> > >   Sqoop 1.99.4
> > >   Oozie 4.0.1
> > >   Giraph 1.1.0
> > >   Groovy 2.3
> > >   Hue 3.6.0
> > >   DataFU 1.0.0
> > >   Solr 4.6.0
> > >   Crunch 0.10.0
> > >   Spark 1.1.0
> > >   Phoenix 4.1.0
> > >   Tomcat 6.0.36
> > >   jsvc 1.0.15
> > >   What other new stuff do we feel like adding?
> >
> > This looks like a reasonable list. How about we put it into the JIRA
> > as a current plan of record?
> >
> > > To retire:
> > >   Pig (is there enough interest in the community to keep it on?)
> >
> > I'd rather keep it.
> >
> > >   Whirr 0.8.2 (seems to be headed to the Attic)
> >
> > +1 to dropping it
> >
> > >   Mahout 0.9 (unless we have a version working w/ Hadoop 2)
> >
> > It seems Mahout has migrated to SPARK 100%. If that
> > works -- I'd be interested in maintaining it.
> >
> > >   Flume 1.5.0.1 (the project seems to be winding down?)
> >
> > Flume still seems to be pretty widely used and historically
> > it hasn't caused us that much trouble. Keeping?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Roman.
> >
>=20
>=20
>=20
> --=20
> jay vyas

--Qbvjkv9qwOGw/5Fx
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUPI0lAAoJEKtmQW7Qw4JP0esH/RxWbRPnXhwk+JjNYCsPtC4m
UyYZAY0hKY1U29lYNuzn+uy9tzaOqfmRWEm1rM35D+61twiCHeq2WJoXG0IikrxH
keeyFZPPm6e6FvnyrcU53laYPeeIGeCuIn5OB7yQeh1p4O6Gq0RAicV4HGgYxjjR
LmRjh020l996DQ+1KkqVGxVL08zVQyZ8uFXlmRpNdqs8VougKkdBl1er08FJnxQp
AHUYfPhGo45ElYQDLupoWeOucviwn0U4d1mR7T3RB2numaneskDBuhKWjmQJ+IY/
71W81+LtkA/dFEZ3nXF1cn/iIt8LMMP94GgCIUXBavUa0jM5RGUf11KxuvIgNr4=
=2tzM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Qbvjkv9qwOGw/5Fx--