Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-bigtop-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-bigtop-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 118AD10EDC for ; Tue, 31 Dec 2013 17:21:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 69663 invoked by uid 500); 31 Dec 2013 17:21:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-bigtop-user-archive@bigtop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69505 invoked by uid 500); 31 Dec 2013 17:21:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@bigtop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@bigtop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@bigtop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69490 invoked by uid 99); 31 Dec 2013 17:21:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 Dec 2013 17:21:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of shaposhnik@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.43 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.43] (HELO mail-oa0-f43.google.com) (209.85.219.43) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 Dec 2013 17:21:37 +0000 Received: by mail-oa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id i7so13410825oag.30 for ; Tue, 31 Dec 2013 09:21:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/EjXPjMocE66ZZIsn/aJ+nPRgU1VDu3JjHEWxwXB8Wc=; b=U6x6JwHtltohmuL/DxjUprrWpYfkBTuQFatcjkJ3l1T1mpPXH/yyTssUpD79GpAG+i 94SU4gzoTM1CpBgDdRYVRPsxuO7YaSY2awUg9qpfPHmLxJTe9kwczBTO8mF4q11emq9U v9dXIJqiHNFiWMfrtC5iXdGriHkrz8BuR3yC6LGBlnEcoVzd9s2nKeFi1cverxJZ/hwx LOc8NCBRaJA3Tu5REocndYEAOYaVc6hEqDwRVIXm8TFDVHnyzwIOqIexXca7ZOnO6uBC NGa4taC1NrAYJFxCa8Lbu6Y5v1Ju8iZZ6Do4BKmCx93eunEb3hgHebHtvDoY6EW25COW sO3Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.28.35 with SMTP id y3mr7035745obg.55.1388510476301; Tue, 31 Dec 2013 09:21:16 -0800 (PST) Sender: shaposhnik@gmail.com Received: by 10.182.133.101 with HTTP; Tue, 31 Dec 2013 09:21:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2013 09:21:16 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Xuk9QMT7I6xcMqwybOTzJFxM5MI Message-ID: Subject: Re: Cluster Management: OpenSource & Vendor Options From: Roman Shaposhnik To: "user@bigtop.apache.org" Cc: "user@ambari.apache.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 7:10 AM, Steven N=FA=F1ez wrote: > Thanks. That issue answers pretty much all the questions. I=92d certainly= give > it a +1 if I had a login. That definitely seems like the right direction = to > move in. I don=92t know the internals, but if everyone is using BigTop fo= r > packaging, perhaps there=92s some way to read the manifest files (if that= =92s > what they=92re called) to produce what Ambari needs for management. >From the Bigtop side of things -- I'd love to see a better integration betw= een Ambari and Bigtop. As a datapoint -- I poked around HDP2 (the distro that Ambari seems to support in the best possible way) and it looked very similar to Bigtop in layout and everything else. Perhaps it won't be that big of a deal to adopt Ambari to support Bigtop distro natively. That would have an added benefit of all the Bigtop-derived distros (Cloudera, Hortonworks, Intel, Pivotal, WANDisco) getting the baseline support for free. I'd love to help from Bigtop side of things, but my Ambari foo is weak enough to request somebody from the Ambari team of developers to help. So... if there's enough interest, perhaps we can find a way? Thanks, Roman.