Mailing-List: contact user-help@bigtop.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@bigtop.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of shaposhnik@gmail.com designates
 209.85.223.178 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: shaposhnik@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAPQV63Vm=QDeMhx5vD9-_WDpj-bOxOcUDwRrEPpwVm-mrTts6A@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAPQV63X9u--OKvfuOeagNZoMivAnS9FRk+xg1ysknmphyUeEnw@mail.gmail.com>
	<511A026E.9060507@apache.org>
	<CALtD8XfyJ051b2vsoDe-jghxcsEH6YrwvYJVcg83tqpmjGYsmg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAKm=R7XPbFuCKZs=shY53C_Zz4tLcq5zeMZKn18bT5xKRJj-pw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPQV63Vm=QDeMhx5vD9-_WDpj-bOxOcUDwRrEPpwVm-mrTts6A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 20:05:21 -0800
Message-ID: 
 <CA+ULb+tQf2QanBD5wEOF4MiN8fW85vPRGp_41Xmar6Q_hbY+uw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: BigTop 0.3.0 vs make hadoop-deb
From: Roman Shaposhnik <roman@shaposhnik.org>
To: user@bigtop.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 7:10 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari
<jean-marc@spaggiari.org> wrote:
> @Bruno: I think also that it's the issue. If I have time I will give
> it a try and change the local...

Please do let us know what happens. Better yet, could you please
create a JIRA and record your experience over there? That way
we can benefit from it some time down the road.

> @Doug: I don't see version 1.1.0 anywhere :( It's all 1.0.x... x
> beeing 1 for BigTop, but 4 for the last hadoop release.
> @Mark: Exact. It's trying to take a version which doesn't exist. Maybe
> the script should try to retreive the most recent 1.0.x version
> instead of a fixed one?

Bigtop releases guarantee a certain bill of materials -- in that we can't
retroactively change the source of the bits. We can, however, provide
those fixes in the branch-0.3. -- send us a patch!

Thanks,
Roman.