bigtop-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bruno Mahé (Commented) (JIRA) <>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (BIGTOP-389) need to start packaging apache commons daemon jsvc
Date Wed, 29 Feb 2012 20:29:58 GMT


Bruno Mahé commented on BIGTOP-389:


+Architecture: i386 amd64 

Why not use "any"? Does it only build on i386 and amd64 exclusively? I would rather keep it
open unless it really only builds on i386 and amd64 only.

Nitpick: Should we follow Fedora guidelines regarding license names? They already have a standardized
 and consistent set of short names for license:

{noformat}+BIGTOP_JSVC_RELNOTES_NAME=Apache Commons Daemon (jsvc){noformat}
I don't think it's being used (yet). But it does not hurt either to keep it.

> need to start packaging apache commons daemon jsvc
> --------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: BIGTOP-389
>                 URL:
>             Project: Bigtop
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: General
>    Affects Versions: 0.2.0
>            Reporter: Roman Shaposhnik
>            Assignee: Roman Shaposhnik
>             Fix For: 0.3.0
>         Attachments: BIGTOP-389-2.patch.txt, BIGTOP-389.patch.txt
> The packages for jsvc seem to lag behind on Linux distros, it would be nice if Bigtop
provided the packages of the latest ones as they are need by Hadoop DN.
> Please note we're not attempting to repackage the JAVA part of the commons daemon project.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see:


View raw message