Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-bigtop-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-bigtop-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3BFCF8607 for ; Sat, 13 Aug 2011 01:35:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 72097 invoked by uid 500); 13 Aug 2011 01:35:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-bigtop-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 72047 invoked by uid 500); 13 Aug 2011 01:35:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact bigtop-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: bigtop-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list bigtop-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 72034 invoked by uid 99); 13 Aug 2011 01:35:12 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 13 Aug 2011 01:35:12 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO [172.29.15.235]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username bmahe, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 13 Aug 2011 01:35:12 +0000 Message-ID: <4E45D4CF.2030804@apache.org> Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 18:35:11 -0700 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bruno_Mah=E9?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110707 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bigtop-dev@incubator.apache.org CC: Andrew Bayer Subject: Re: [VOTE] Review then commit, or commit then review References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 08/08/2011 10:06 AM, Andrew Bayer wrote: > Hey all - > > I'm calling a vote on whether we should go with review then commit (R-T-C) > or commit then review (C-T-R). See definitions at > http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html. The vote's open for 72 > hours, and is open to anyone on the committers or mentors list at > http://incubator.apache.org/projects/bigtop.html. Thanks! > > A. > Is the vote closed?