bigtop-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Bayer <andrew.ba...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: RTC process/policy discussion
Date Mon, 15 Aug 2011 18:14:26 GMT
Yeah, I would too, but first we need functional build boxes. =) Once we've
got those and a functioning build, I'll bang out the patch build.

A.

On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Roman Shaposhnik <rvs@apache.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Andrew Bayer <andrew.bayer@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > So we've settled on RTC. Now the question is what the process/policy will
> > be. I'd tend to go with the most lightweight we can get - a 72 hour
> window
> > for voting? Does that sound reasonable? Do we need more than one +1 to
> > approve something?
>
> I'd go with 72 hours and just a single +1. I also would like to have a
> testpatch-like
> process in place so that submitted patches can be automatically vetted
> on at least
> CentOS/Ubuntu (would be really nice to also include OpenSUSE/Debian).
>
> Thanks,
> Roman.
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message