Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-beehive-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 73771 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2008 15:58:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Apr 2008 15:58:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 69358 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2008 15:58:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-beehive-dev-archive@beehive.apache.org Received: (qmail 69333 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2008 15:58:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@beehive.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Beehive Developers" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@beehive.apache.org Received: (qmail 69322 invoked by uid 99); 26 Apr 2008 15:58:28 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 26 Apr 2008 08:58:28 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of carlin.rogers@gmail.com designates 209.85.132.247 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.132.247] (HELO an-out-0708.google.com) (209.85.132.247) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 26 Apr 2008 15:57:36 +0000 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c3so1161300ana.5 for ; Sat, 26 Apr 2008 08:57:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=pEUROGANSU48EAmOHwkTzZIUCO7uyKl+ddCM7Nzfr9M=; b=Xgaknch2n15HORjD7cmUuKnQvazEEhdKHufeeJ73JmHpXSQ27pCyYCninISY7Iy/js+av1rp9/AIo3+vau5BGhwmbLXTd5FWkrEPav/YuBj7EPKJtQST8YJZsadGPRMF3MJrTflWM4ou49i9Fa1qrfIIqHM87eZu5BfTEPjhhzw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=L+hVWBxyPHjrdGN+if2amO45ETcdbXvZjJ0nUvwMeDRUmL0mSOcTtUq9s6Dkto2IxJEOrHLRJYnzXPJuwpn1YKNAvkK8sCSz1Lahp4wdLNDLbURVWcS8GwFeDZfzw1FX7+aArvgWY42p40nMzT0fSHqDVwfr28oCUWHIxfpByxU= Received: by 10.100.215.5 with SMTP id n5mr9443470ang.133.1209225476982; Sat, 26 Apr 2008 08:57:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.107.2 with HTTP; Sat, 26 Apr 2008 08:57:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 09:57:56 -0600 From: "Carlin Rogers" To: "Beehive Developers" Subject: Re: Is Beehive still an active project? In-Reply-To: <30A4BD5E3172E0488D6CE13431018D52155B26@bwpms801.innovate.vurv.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <30A4BD5E3172E0488D6CE13431018D52155B26@bwpms801.innovate.vurv.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Eirik, The user community is active but I feel that the development activity has been limited. Contributions since the last release have consisted of bug fixes, minor feature improvements/enhancements, and documentation improvements. These types of changes would be appropriate for a new point release (1.0.3) but it has not been proposed yet. I really haven't seen activity or plans in the Beehive dev community about future work such as Struts 2 support, etc. As an open source project, contributions are always welcomed. Kind regards, Carlin On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 4:57 PM, Eirik Rude wrote: > We are in the process of choosing a new framework to move all of our development to. One of the frameworks being considered is Beehive since we are on Weblogic servers. Can you tell us if this framework is still active, and if this is something we should be considering. > > Thank you, > Eirik Rude > Senior Internationalization Architect > Vurv Technology >