beehive-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Chad Schoettger (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Resolved: (BEEHIVE-558) Controls doc needs discussion of control state
Date Wed, 07 Feb 2007 21:47:05 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEEHIVE-558?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Chad Schoettger resolved BEEHIVE-558.
-------------------------------------

       Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version/s: V.Next
         Assignee: Jacob Danner  (was: Chad Schoettger)

Updated doc, svn rev 504701

> Controls doc needs discussion of control state
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BEEHIVE-558
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEEHIVE-558
>             Project: Beehive
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Documentation
>    Affects Versions: v1m1
>            Reporter: Kyle Marvin
>         Assigned To: Jacob Danner
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: V.Next
>
>
> The Controls programming model doc could be made better by adding a discussion of state
handling for controls if serialized.   This would discuss topics such as:
> - how properties state is serialized for the bean
> - the fact that external config/annotations aren't written into local instance state
> - the isTransient attribute of @ControlImplementation (see BEEHIVE-351)
> - the fact that contextual services are never serialized
> - a discussion of XML vs. Java serialization

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message