Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-beehive-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 72092 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2007 00:49:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jan 2007 00:49:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 29451 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jan 2007 00:49:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-beehive-dev-archive@beehive.apache.org Received: (qmail 29342 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jan 2007 00:49:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@beehive.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Beehive Developers" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@beehive.apache.org Received: (qmail 29331 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jan 2007 00:49:34 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Jan 2007 16:49:34 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of ekoneil@gmail.com designates 66.249.92.172 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.92.172] (HELO ug-out-1314.google.com) (66.249.92.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Jan 2007 16:49:26 -0800 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id u40so1370693ugc for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2007 16:49:05 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=lK09X1quFbB59YYDhDmtk6CfCp6nxCh5PoDjP9DP1nvxjnMZ2Hxam9d8f6ohGHqTKqp9Y4D8AfFx6lZ8T9FqPgIJMvZ2iaNYRFrExWvufIMDJujWK1CDT+B+qKfL2LfybgUtKrclp4c8/uTnLqDtebBEXqZIuFY0TNGijUfO8sE= Received: by 10.82.114.3 with SMTP id m3mr763259buc.1168908543771; Mon, 15 Jan 2007 16:49:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.151.1 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Jan 2007 16:49:03 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 17:49:03 -0700 From: "Eddie O'Neil" To: "Beehive Developers" Subject: Re: Need to fix the 1.0.2 installation document In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Great! Thanks for taking care of it. I'll put together a HOWTO on the wiki that covers some of these kinds of tasks. Eddie On 1/15/07, Carlin Rogers wrote: > Excellent. Thanks for all the information. I've copied the new files > into /www/beehive.apache.org/docs/1.0.2/. The permissions seem to be > fine. > > Thanks, > Carlin > > On 1/15/07, Eddie O'Neil wrote: > > Carlin-- > > > > Good question -- it's best to use people.apache.org, but any machine > > should give you access to the same underlying file system. It's > > probably easiest to scp the files to: > > > > /www/beehive.apache.org/docs/1.0.2/ > > > > which is a directory in the ASF file system. Then you can ssh to > > people.apache.org machine to ensure that the permissions are set > > correctly. Once this is done, it will take an hour or so before > > changed content is mirrored to the live web servers, so don't be > > concerned if your changes aren't visible for a while. :) > > > > The ASF Infrastructure team owns administering these machines; more > > information on ASF infrastructure is here: > > > > http://www.apache.org/dev/ > > > > or in the infrastructure@ mailing list. > > > > Hope that helps. > > > > Eddie > > > > On 1/15/07, Carlin Rogers wrote: > > > Eddie, > > > > > > Does it matter which apache.org machine I use to update the site > > > files? From an old email I have, there was a comment about > > > minotaur.apache.org. I'm not familiar with the process for replicating > > > the web site and just wanted to verify the Apache process for this. Is > > > there an Apache page with this info? > > > > > > Many thanks, > > > Carlin > > > > > > On 1/15/07, Eddie O'Neil wrote: > > > > Carlin-- > > > > > > > > I've updated the permissions on the entire /www/beehive.apache.org/ > > > > directory, so this should be writable to you and anyone else in the > > > > "beehive" group. > > > > > > > > As far as signing the documentation kits, I don't think that this is > > > > necessary, especially if the website is updated. Since Apache > > > > releases are created by a vote on an SVN change number, any release of > > > > new bits would require a re-vote on a new SVN changelist. If this was > > > > a fix for an egregious bug, I'd agree that we should re-release, but > > > > in this case it seems fine to live with this issue. > > > > > > > > My $0.02. > > > > > > > > Eddie > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 1/15/07, Carlin Rogers wrote: > > > > > Eddie, > > > > > > > > > > I checked in the fix for the link issue. However, I don't have a key > > > > > to sign the documentation kits. Can you post these? Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > I also tried to copy the new single changed page and associated PDF > > > > > file into the /www/beehive.apache.org/docs/1.0.2 directory but was > > > > > unable to because of permissions. It looks like the file is only > > > > > writable by you. If you change the permissions, I can copy the new > > > > > files into place. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Carlin > > > > > > > > > > On 1/15/07, Eddie O'Neil wrote: > > > > > > Carlin-- > > > > > > > > > > > > It's good that someone caught that. :) > > > > > > > > > > > > This would just follow the usual way of updating a release > > > > > > documentation kit, namely: > > > > > > #1) Commit an update to branches/v1.0.2/... that fixes the problem > > > > > > #2) Rebuild the documentation kit (see Ant targets in branches/v1.0.2/build.xml) > > > > > > #3) Update the live website hosted in > > > > > > /www/beehive.apache.org/docs/1.0.2 with the new documentation kit, > > > > > > single changed page, etc. > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll make sure that this is captured in a wiki page somewhere. Let me > > > > > > know if you have questions. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > Eddie > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 1/15/07, Carlin Rogers wrote: > > > > > > > Eddie, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I was wondering what the process was to update a release build > > > > > > > document (not the site documents) out on the beehive web site. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Greg Mally caught an issue with the 1.0.2 installation document, > > > > > > > http://beehive.apache.org/docs/1.0.2/installation.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The document has the correct text in the link for the download, > > > > > > > release-1.0.2.cgi. However, the actual link that was generated from > > > > > > > the installation.xml for href="site:beehive-release/current" points to > > > > > > > release-1.0.cgi. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The installation.html document in the distribution has the same issue > > > > > > > but it's probably best to at least fix the document out on the Web > > > > > > > site. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I can take care of this if you'd like but just wanted to know the > > > > > > > process for doing something like this. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > Carlin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >