beehive-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Eddie O'Neil" <ekon...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: JSR 181 support for axis2
Date Wed, 02 Aug 2006 15:03:28 GMT
  Sure -- just saw the thread.  He asks some good questions.

  Will comment in axis-dev@

Eddie


On 8/2/06, Rajith Attapattu <rajith77@gmail.com> wrote:
> Eddie,
>
> There are some comments by Nicholas on WSM in the axis2 thread on JSR 181.
> Could u take peek when ever time permits you and answer them from the WSM
> POV.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Rajith
>
> On 7/30/06, Eddie O'Neil <ekoneil@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Dims--
> >
> >   Thanks for the great feedback -- these are fixed.
> >
> > Eddie
> >
> >
> >
> > On 7/30/06, Davanum Srinivas <davanum@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Hi Eddie,
> > >
> > > Needed a couple of things to get "ant clean build install test" working.
> > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEEHIVE-1136
> > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEEHIVE-1137
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > > dims
> > >
> > > On 7/29/06, Eddie O'Neil <ekoneil@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Dims--
> > > >
> > > >   One more tip (needed to make sure it worked), I'm able to do this:
> > > >
> > > > cd /foobar/wsm
> > > > svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/beehive/wsm/trunk .
> > > > ant clean build install test
> > > >
> > > > to checkout and build a clean source tree, so if using a local M2 repo
> > > > is easier than dealing with the one online, that's fine for now until
> > > > nightlies builds work.
> > > >
> > > > Eddie
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 7/29/06, Eddie O'Neil <ekoneil@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >   Heh...it's neither hourly nor nightly.  Today, Beehive doesn't
> > have
> > > > > builds integrated into ASF infrastructure (sadly...).
> > > > >
> > > > >   If you need to make any changes, I can just move the build to:
> > > > >
> > > > >   http://people.apache.org/dist/snapshots/maven2/
> > > > >
> > > > > and send you the script I used to install the JARs via Maven2 and
> > scp.
> > > > >
> > > > >   For any local changes, though, the WSM build will actually install
> > > > > built JARs directly into your local Maven2 repository if that's
> > > > > easier.
> > > > >
> > > > > Eddie
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 7/29/06, Davanum Srinivas <davanum@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > Eddie,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Great!! Is this a hourly build or a nightly build? :) Just In
case
> > i
> > > > > > need to do any changes to beehive i can plan accordingly.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > thanks,
> > > > > > dims
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 7/29/06, Eddie O'Neil <ekoneil@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > Dims / Rajith--
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >   I've uploaded a WSM snapshot to a Maven2 repository here:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >     http://people.apache.org/~ekoneil/repository/maven2/
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > it contains these artifacts:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >   beehive-wsm
> > > > > > >   beehive-jsr181
> > > > > > >   beehive-wsdltypes
> > > > > > >   beehive-wsm-axis
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The first three would be needed to support the 181 work
on
> > Axis2; the
> > > > > > > fourth JAR is only needed for Axis1.x.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >   These should help the work to get Rajith's code integrated
to
> > the
> > > > > > > Axis2 build.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >   I'm starting to work on two more things on the WSM side:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 1) an annotation processor extension for code generating
a
> > > > > > > services.xml file given an annotated Java source file
> > > > > > > 2) a Maven2 archetype for building Axis2 services with
WSM that
> > would
> > > > > > > use #1 and produce a .jar file that can be renamed to .aar
and
> > > > > > > deployed
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Let me know how the repository works out.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Eddie
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ::::: pom.xml snip for WSM support
> > > > > > >         <dependency>
> > > > > > >             <groupId>org.apache.beehive</groupId>
> > > > > > >             <artifactId>beehive-jsr181</artifactId>
> > > > > > >             <version>1.0-SNAPSNOT</version>
> > > > > > >         </dependency>
> > > > > > >         <dependency>
> > > > > > >             <groupId>org.apache.beehive</groupId>
> > > > > > >             <artifactId>beehive-wsm</artifactId>
> > > > > > >             <version>1.0-SNAPSNOT</version>
> > > > > > >         </dependency>
> > > > > > >         <dependency>
> > > > > > >             <groupId>org.apache.beehive</groupId>
> > > > > > >             <artifactId>beehive-wsdltypes</artifactId>
> > > > > > >             <version>1.0-SNAPSNOT</version>
> > > > > > >         </dependency>
> > > > > > > :::::
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ::::: Add this to your M2 settings.xml
> > > > > > >                 <repository>
> > > > > > >                     <id>wsm-snapshot</id>
> > > > > > >                     <name>wsm-snapshot</name>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > <url>http://people.apache.org/~ekoneil/repository/maven2</url>
> > > > > > >                 </repository>
> > > > > > > :::::
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Rajith Attapattu <rajith77@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > > > > > > > Thanks Eddie.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Eddie O'Neil <ekoneil@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >   FYI -- will have JARs in a Maven2 repo later
today.  They
> > won't be
> > > > > > > > > mirrored, but there will be public access to
them.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Eddie
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Rajith Attapattu <rajith77@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > Eddie,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Awesome, thanks a lot.
> > > > > > > > > > Yes, please reply to the thread on axis2
dev about my
> > proposed ASM based
> > > > > > > > > > class scanner for the drop in support.
> > > > > > > > > > If you can or Dims can have a the jars in
your maven
> > repos, then Dims
> > > > > > > > > can
> > > > > > > > > > work on the patch and see how to proceed
further.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Thanks guys for the support.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Rajith
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Eddie O'Neil <ekoneil@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Rajith / Dims --
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >   I committed Rajith's patch that adds
the reflection
> > support for
> > > > > > > > > > > creating a WsmService using annogen.
 The one change to
> > the patch was
> > > > > > > > > > > that I moved the generated annogen
beans from "javax.jws"
> > to
> > > > > > > > > > > "o.a.b.w.axis.annogen" and removed
the annogen
> > annotations from the
> > > > > > > > > > > "javax.jws" classes as per the legal-discuss
thread.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >   This should free Dims up to start
the work of applying
> > the Axis
> > > > > > > > > patch.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >   Next steps are to upload this to
my Maven repo and to
> > talk about
> > > > > > > > > > > whether / how to support drop-in web
service wiring in
> > axis-dev@.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Eddie
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On 7/25/06, Rajith Attapattu <rajith77@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > Eddie,
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks and my pleasure to do the
patch.
> > > > > > > > > > > > Once we have the changes and a
build in the repo, Dims
> > can work on
> > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > patch
> > > > > > > > > > > > for axis2.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you once again.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Re: The validation part and the
WSDL stuff, lets take
> > it to the
> > > > > > > > > > > axis-list as
> > > > > > > > > > > > you suggested.
> > > > > > > > > > > > We can start by publishing the
questions u had on it
> > the last time
> > > > > > > > > we
> > > > > > > > > > > > emailed.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Rajith
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/25/06, Eddie O'Neil <ekoneil@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Rajith--
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >   Yeah -- I started looking
at the patch last night
> > and have it up
> > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > running with the existing
WSM tests passing.  I've
> > not done the
> > > > > > > > > work
> > > > > > > > > > > > > to just copy the source files
annogen creates, but
> > that's the easy
> > > > > > > > > > > > > part.  :)  Thanks for the
patch!
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Dims--
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >   No, we've not done a nightly
build for a
> > while.  With Rajith's
> > > > > > > > > patch
> > > > > > > > > > > > > (and external eyes that need
to be on a WSM
> > distributable), I was
> > > > > > > > > > > > > going to start publishing
a WSM snapshot to a Maven2
> > repo on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > people.apache.org/~ekoneil.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >   Sound good?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Eddie
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/25/06, Davanum Srinivas
<davanum@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > does beehive have a
nightly build? are the
> > snapshots published
> > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > any
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > maven repo?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > thx,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > dims
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/25/06, Rajith Attapattu
<rajith77@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Eddie,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dims also things
its fine to include the
> > generated AnnoBeans
> > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > source
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > treee and then
remove the meta annotations from
> > the spec
> > > > > > > > > files,
> > > > > > > > > > > thus
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > avoiding the legal
issue.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Eddie, can u then
check the patch and commit
> > with nessacery
> > > > > > > > > > > changes.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Note the task to
generate AnnoBeans is commented
> > out !!!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >         Also u
need to javac the generated
> > source files from
> > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > new
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > location within
the source tree instead of the
> > temp directory
> > > > > > > > > > > where it
> > > > > > > > > > > > > was
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I will attach the
generated source files as a
> > patch. (pls add
> > > > > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > the main
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > source tree)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Let me know how
it goes.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If we can sort
this out on the wsm side then I
> > can sort it out
> > > > > > > > > on
> > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > axis2
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > side with Dims
help :-)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Eddie, thanks for
your support.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rajith
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1- 416- 482- 2661
x 308
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/24/06, Rajith
Attapattu <rajith77@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hey Eddie,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thats what
I thought too. Once we generate the
> > AnnoBeans we
> > > > > > > > > can
> > > > > > > > > > > > > delete the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > annotations
from the spec file.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We can include
the generated source as part of
> > the permanent
> > > > > > > > > > > source
> > > > > > > > > > > > > tree.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Since this
is a spec file there is no need to
> > generate the
> > > > > > > > > > > AnnoBeans
> > > > > > > > > > > > > over
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and over as
the spec files are static, hence
> > the generated
> > > > > > > > > > > source
> > > > > > > > > > > > > never
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > change.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So lets do
that if you are ok with it.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rajith
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/24/06,
Eddie O'Neil <ekoneil@gmail.com >
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   A'right
-- mail is in
> > legal-discuss@.  Will be
> > > > > > > > > interesting
> > > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > see
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > how that
conversation turns
> > out.  :)  Interested parties
> > > > > > > > > > > should
> > > > > > > > > > > > > follow
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the discussion
there.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Eddie
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/23/06,
Eddie O'Neil <ekoneil@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Rajith--
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
  Hey -- something came up this weekend
> > and I am just
> > > > > > > > > > > getting
> > > > > > > > > > > > > back to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
this now.  My gut is that this type of
> > metadata
> > > > > > > > > modification
> > > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > an API
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
class isn't going to fly (mail about this
> > shortly);
> > > > > > > > > since
> > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > annogen
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
beans are just generated from the
> > annotations
> > > > > > > > > themselves,
> > > > > > > > > > > can we
> > > > > > > > > > > > > just
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
hand code them to match the JSR-181
> > annotations?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
  Will take a look at the patch...
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Eddie
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
On 7/23/06, Rajith Attapattu <
> > rajith77@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> Eddie,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> any update on the issue?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> Regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> Rajith
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> On 7/20/06, Rajith Attapattu <
> > rajith77@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > Eddie,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > I totally forgot about sending the
> > patch, but
> > > > > > > > > finnaly
> > > > > > > > > > > did it
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > today.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > Please review it and let me know your
> > comments.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > We still need to figure out the legal
> > issue about
> > > > > > > > > adding
> > > > > > > > > > > an
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > annotation
to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > the spec class.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > (Does annogen have a way around
> > without annotatiing
> > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > classes,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for it
to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > generate the AnnoBean classes.???)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > 2.) Generating Annogen beans for
> > meta data
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > >     The annogen task that generates
> > code based on
> > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > annotated
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > classes
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > seems to have a bug with inner
> > classes.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > >     For example WebParam.Mode gives
> > compilation
> > > > > > > > > errors
> > > > > > > > > > > as
> > > > > > > > > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cannot
the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > handle the inner class
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > >     So I eidted the generated source
> > file to get
> > > > > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > > > > > > working. (I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > maybe
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > wrong
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > here...)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > This is still an issue :-(
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > Regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > Rajith
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > On 7/11/06, Rajith Attapattu <
> > rajith77@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > Eddie,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > oops, didn't think it was that
> > serious about
> > > > > > > > > modifying
> > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > spec
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > classes.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > But can u please let me know about
> > it.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >[eko] Not sure I follow this -- let
> > me take a
> > > > > > > > > look at
> > > > > > > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll
get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >back to you.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > I didn't even submit the patch for
> > this part. I
> > > > > > > > > will
> > > > > > > > > > > do
> > > > > > > > > > > > > so.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > Please take a look at it then.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > I am really gratefull for your
> > assitance.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > Rajith
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > On 7/11/06, Eddie O'Neil <
> > ekoneil@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > Rajith--
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >   Comments on both of your
> > questions below...
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > Eddie
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > 1.)  Annogen requires you to
> > annotate the
> > > > > > > > > > > annotation
> > > > > > > > > > > > > classes
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > following annotation
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > Now are we allowed to modifty
> > the JSR api
> > > > > > > > > classes
> > > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > add the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > above
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > lines of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > code ??
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > [eko] This is a *great*
> > question  :)  and
> > > > > > > > > probably
> > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > first
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > time
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > we've run into this at Apache.  If
> > you were
> > > > > > > > > asking
> > > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > add a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *method*
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > to a type described in a
> > specification, the
> > > > > > > > > answer
> > > > > > > > > > > would
> > > > > > > > > > > > > be no
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > because
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > we can't change spec
> > classes.  Since it's
> > > > > > > > > metadata,
> > > > > > > > > > > I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > don't
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > know
the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > answer -- my gut would be that we
> > can't change
> > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > metadata on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > specification class, but it's a
> > question worth
> > > > > > > > > > > asking
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > legal@apache
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > just to see what folks think.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > 2.) Generating Annogen beans for
> > meta data
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >     The annogen task that
> > generates code based
> > > > > > > > > on
> > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > annotated
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > classes
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > seems to have a bug with inner
> > classes.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >     For example WebParam.Modegives
> > > > > > > > > compilation
> > > > > > > > > > > errors
> > > > > > > > > > > > > as it
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cannot
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > handle the inner class
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >     So I eidted the generated
> > source file to
> > > > > > > > > get
> > > > > > > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > > > > > > working.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > maybe wrong
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > here...)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > [eko] Not sure I follow this --
> > let me take a
> > > > > > > > > look
> > > > > > > > > > > at it
> > > > > > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll
get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > back to you.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Davanum Srinivas : http://www.wso2.net
(Oxygen for
> > Web Service
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Developers)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Davanum Srinivas : http://www.wso2.net (Oxygen for Web Service
> > Developers)
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Davanum Srinivas : http://www.wso2.net (Oxygen for Web Service
> > Developers)
> > >
> >
>
>

Mime
View raw message