Mailing-List: contact dev-help@beehive.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Beehive Developers" <dev@beehive.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of ekoneil@gmail.com designates
 64.233.182.184 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=ZJVybxN2WBflGAgq6suvzEJg9bqDkMZRoacGUKL0HxI1S+1XuLMa+9W0JiXq7WyH1adAd+od3c7BoSVhKHV4zu1QUOoUIyxA0rrDPx5ueSBGXeIDC3Gfpdbg9o/rsGxZIM5w4Mje7Lt2OSST7WRqoEfJmUPfQYHKKMBjhtr7YvM=
Message-ID: <e9ac83540607232143t78e2ec6bt6265f6b27dbdf27d@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 22:43:12 -0600
From: "Eddie O'Neil" <ekoneil@gmail.com>
To: "Beehive Developers" <dev@beehive.apache.org>
Subject: Re: JSR 181 support for axis2
In-Reply-To: <e9ac83540607232114ic68171h16078c0861eba892@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <f5f5e0730607092023k2bce03abv75e88e9899d76d0b@mail.gmail.com>
	 <e9ac83540607110723u3973c70fn3f6263a1cf95006@mail.gmail.com>
	 <f5f5e0730607110755m5963dceide87cba1b0a9ffe4@mail.gmail.com>
	 <f5f5e0730607201356nb6e77d3y89a3740aad11024b@mail.gmail.com>
	 <f5f5e0730607231409u7d348113s1ecb6a97f5b019e0@mail.gmail.com>
	 <e9ac83540607232114ic68171h16078c0861eba892@mail.gmail.com>

  A'right -- mail is in legal-discuss@.  Will be interesting to see
how that conversation turns out.  :)  Interested parties should follow
the discussion there.

Eddie


On 7/23/06, Eddie O'Neil <ekoneil@gmail.com> wrote:
> Rajith--
>
>   Hey -- something came up this weekend and I am just getting back to
> this now.  My gut is that this type of metadata modification to an API
> class isn't going to fly (mail about this shortly); since the annogen
> beans are just generated from the annotations themselves, can we just
> hand code them to match the JSR-181 annotations?
>
>   Will take a look at the patch...
>
> Eddie
>
>
>
> On 7/23/06, Rajith Attapattu <rajith77@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Eddie,
> >
> > any update on the issue?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Rajith
> >
> > On 7/20/06, Rajith Attapattu <rajith77@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Eddie,
> > >
> > > I totally forgot about sending the patch, but finnaly did it today.
> > > Please review it and let me know your comments.
> > >
> > > We still need to figure out the legal issue about adding an annotation to
> > > the spec class.
> > > (Does annogen have a way around without annotatiing the classes, for it to
> > > generate the AnnoBean classes.???)
> > >
> > > > 2.) Generating Annogen beans for meta data
> > > >     The annogen task that generates code based on the annotated classes
> > > > seems to have a bug with inner classes.
> > > >     For example WebParam.Mode gives compilation errors as it cannot the
> > > > handle the inner class
> > > >     So I eidted the generated source file to get it working. (I maybe
> > > wrong
> > > > here...)
> > > >
> > >
> > > This is still an issue :-(
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Rajith
> > >
> > > On 7/11/06, Rajith Attapattu <rajith77@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Eddie,
> > > >
> > > > oops, didn't think it was that serious about modifying the spec classes.
> > > > But can u please let me know about it.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >[eko] Not sure I follow this -- let me take a look at it and I'll get
> > > > >back to you.
> > > > I didn't even submit the patch for this part. I will do so.
> > > > Please take a look at it then.
> > > >
> > > > I am really gratefull for your assitance.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Rajith
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 7/11/06, Eddie O'Neil <ekoneil@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Rajith--
> > > > >
> > > > >   Comments on both of your questions below...
> > > > >
> > > > > Eddie
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 1.)  Annogen requires you to annotate the annotation classes with
> > > > > the
> > > > > > following annotation
> > > > > > Now are we allowed to modifty the JSR api classes to add the above
> > > > > lines of
> > > > > > code ??
> > > > >
> > > > > [eko] This is a *great* question  :)  and probably the first time
> > > > > we've run into this at Apache.  If you were asking to add a *method*
> > > > > to a type described in a specification, the answer would be no because
> > > > >
> > > > > we can't change spec classes.  Since it's metadata, I don't know the
> > > > > answer -- my gut would be that we can't change the metadata on a
> > > > > specification class, but it's a question worth asking legal@apache
> > > > > just to see what folks think.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > 2.) Generating Annogen beans for meta data
> > > > > >     The annogen task that generates code based on the annotated
> > > > > classes
> > > > > > seems to have a bug with inner classes.
> > > > > >     For example WebParam.Mode gives compilation errors as it cannot
> > > > > the
> > > > > > handle the inner class
> > > > > >     So I eidted the generated source file to get it working. (I
> > > > > maybe wrong
> > > > > > here...)
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > [eko] Not sure I follow this -- let me take a look at it and I'll get
> > > > > back to you.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>