Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-beehive-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 49251 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2006 23:41:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Jul 2006 23:41:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 48677 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2006 23:41:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-beehive-dev-archive@beehive.apache.org Received: (qmail 48651 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2006 23:41:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@beehive.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Beehive Developers" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@beehive.apache.org Received: (qmail 48635 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jul 2006 23:41:01 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Jul 2006 16:41:01 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of kentaminator@gmail.com designates 66.249.92.170 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.92.170] (HELO ug-out-1314.google.com) (66.249.92.170) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Jul 2006 16:41:00 -0700 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id m3so952133uge for ; Fri, 07 Jul 2006 16:40:39 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=TL2ZhvB0Y+44wGC8JJxoUw0vijiAmvoBHOSyCL5V+D4x1y4sq1b2YDnJS+dahAyySJ68Op+LNkA7jnHDMICIz6MceDMQyuz7KcURsfrldGRe2c04ySYJ2q1TYBlUYujMOnV1oK/FAUoGwAxvtub634z6QelheIIcLqxiyKJtOC4= Received: by 10.78.170.17 with SMTP id s17mr918369hue; Fri, 07 Jul 2006 16:40:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.158.19 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Jul 2006 16:40:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 16:40:38 -0700 From: "Kenneth Tam" To: "Beehive Developers" Subject: Re: Porting the controls drts from tch to junit In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N +0 on removing JPF dependencies from controls. In general my position is that users are better served by looser coupling between the functional components in Beehive; it makes initial adoption and ongoing experimentation easier. On 7/6/06, Chad Schoettger wrote: > I've ported most of the core control's drt's from the tch test > framework to Junit tests (using the ControlTestContainer). The only > ones that haven't been ported are those tests which use a page flow as > the control container. > > Does anyone have thoughts on what should be done with the tch jpf tests? > > I can think of a couple of options: > > 1 - Go ahead and remove them from the tree, they all have equivalent > JUnit tests with the only difference being the control container. If > removed we would no longer have a dependency on the tch test > framework. > > 2 - Don't remove them and keep the tch dependency. > > - Chad >