beehive-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Rajith Attapattu" <rajit...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: JSR 181 support for axis2
Date Sun, 23 Jul 2006 21:09:36 GMT
Eddie,

any update on the issue?

Regards,

Rajith

On 7/20/06, Rajith Attapattu <rajith77@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Eddie,
>
> I totally forgot about sending the patch, but finnaly did it today.
> Please review it and let me know your comments.
>
> We still need to figure out the legal issue about adding an annotation to
> the spec class.
> (Does annogen have a way around without annotatiing the classes, for it to
> generate the AnnoBean classes.???)
>
> > 2.) Generating Annogen beans for meta data
> >     The annogen task that generates code based on the annotated classes
> > seems to have a bug with inner classes.
> >     For example WebParam.Mode gives compilation errors as it cannot the
> > handle the inner class
> >     So I eidted the generated source file to get it working. (I maybe
> wrong
> > here...)
> >
>
> This is still an issue :-(
>
> Regards,
>
> Rajith
>
> On 7/11/06, Rajith Attapattu <rajith77@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Eddie,
> >
> > oops, didn't think it was that serious about modifying the spec classes.
> > But can u please let me know about it.
> >
> >
> >
> > >[eko] Not sure I follow this -- let me take a look at it and I'll get
> > >back to you.
> > I didn't even submit the patch for this part. I will do so.
> > Please take a look at it then.
> >
> > I am really gratefull for your assitance.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Rajith
> >
> >
> > On 7/11/06, Eddie O'Neil <ekoneil@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Rajith--
> > >
> > >   Comments on both of your questions below...
> > >
> > > Eddie
> > >
> > > >
> > > > 1.)  Annogen requires you to annotate the annotation classes with
> > > the
> > > > following annotation
> > > > Now are we allowed to modifty the JSR api classes to add the above
> > > lines of
> > > > code ??
> > >
> > > [eko] This is a *great* question  :)  and probably the first time
> > > we've run into this at Apache.  If you were asking to add a *method*
> > > to a type described in a specification, the answer would be no because
> > >
> > > we can't change spec classes.  Since it's metadata, I don't know the
> > > answer -- my gut would be that we can't change the metadata on a
> > > specification class, but it's a question worth asking legal@apache
> > > just to see what folks think.
> > >
> > >
> > > > 2.) Generating Annogen beans for meta data
> > > >     The annogen task that generates code based on the annotated
> > > classes
> > > > seems to have a bug with inner classes.
> > > >     For example WebParam.Mode gives compilation errors as it cannot
> > > the
> > > > handle the inner class
> > > >     So I eidted the generated source file to get it working. (I
> > > maybe wrong
> > > > here...)
> > > >
> > >
> > > [eko] Not sure I follow this -- let me take a look at it and I'll get
> > > back to you.
> > >
> >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message